Convergence

Abstract

A key economic issue is whether poor countries or regions tend to grow faster than rich ones: are there automatic forces that lead to convergence over time in the levels of per capita income and product? We use the neoclassical growth model as a framework to study convergence across the 48 contiguous U.S. states. We exploit data on personal income since 1840 and on gross state product since 1963. The U.S. states provide clear evidence of convergence, but the findings can be reconciled quantitatively with the neoclassical model only if diminishing returns to capital set in very slowly. The results for per capita gross domestic product from a broad sample of countries are similar if we hold constant a set of variables that proxy for differences in steady-state characteristics.A key economic issue is whether poor countries or regions tend to grow faster than rich ones: are there automatic forces that lead to convergence over time in the levels of per capita income and product? We use the neoclassical growth model as a framework to study convergence across the 48 contiguous U.S. states. We exploit data on personal income since 1840 and on gross state product since 1963. For studying the determinants of economic growth, the experience We have benefited from research support by the National Science Foundation, the Bradley Foundation, and the Hoover Institution. We appreciate helpful comments from

Urban Growth Drivers and Spatial Inequalities: Europe – A Case with Geographically Sticky People

“…First, in our analysis of growth in GDP per capita we do not include the initial level of GDP per capita. So this analysis does not contribute to the regional growth regression literature stemming from the work of Barro and Sala-i-Martin (Barro, 1990;Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 1991;1992. We find this literature to be both theoretically (see the discussion in Cheshire and Malecki, 2004) and empirically suspect.…”

Trajectories in Knowledge Economy: Empirics from SSA and MENA Countries

“…The motivation of this study typically follows the evidence of income-convergence across countries that has been investigated in the context of neoclassical growth models, originally developed by the seminal studies of Baumol (1986), Barro & Sala-i-Martin (1992, 1995 and Mankiw et al (1992). The theoretical underpinnings of income convergence (as highlighted in the previous section) are abundant in the empirical growth literature (Solow, 1956;Swan, 1956) and have recently been applied in other fields of development.…”

The convergence of health care financing structures: empirical evidence from OECD-countries

“…We start with analysing σ-convergence pictured by the coefficient of variation (CV) and its development over time. It is calculated from cross section information by dividing a variable's standard deviation σ by its mean µ where σ and 7 http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_ political_data_sets/ 8 The latter concepts were developed within the framework of neoclassical growth models to explain the convergence in aggregate output (see for example Barro & Sala-i Martin (1992) for convergence in income per capita) and assume the existence of a steady state in economic development.…”

“…In these regression analyses the focus is on examining whether a series moves toward its mean over time. Barro & Sala-i Martin (1992) show that the average growth rate (based on the neoclassical growth model) of y over a time period between 0 and T is…”