2013
DOI: 10.1137/120880938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence Analysis of Mixed Numerical Schemes for Reactive Flow in a Porous Medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As proved in (Kumar et al 2013), in the limit as δ approaches zero, one ends up with the original (3). Thus, by f δ (T f , u , y), we mean the reaction rate f where w (dist(x, B ), T f , u ) is replaced with w δ (dist( y, B )).…”
Section: The Level Set Equationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As proved in (Kumar et al 2013), in the limit as δ approaches zero, one ends up with the original (3). Thus, by f δ (T f , u , y), we mean the reaction rate f where w (dist(x, B ), T f , u ) is replaced with w δ (dist( y, B )).…”
Section: The Level Set Equationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For the core scale model, the convergence of the semi-discrete and of the fully discrete (conformal and mixed finite element) numerical schemes have been analyzed [33,34]. The rigorous derivation of the macro scale model from the pore scale model in the classical homogenization context is carried out in [30].…”
Section: Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, also other, mass conserving, methods could have been applied like the mixed finite element method (MFEM) or the finite volume (FV) method; see, for example, Kumar et al (2013), Kumar et al (2014), and , in which the convergence is studied as well. In Radu et al (2013), the mixed finite element method is applied on a concrete carbonation model with a variable porosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%