2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/aa9417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence analysis of surrogate-based methods for Bayesian inverse problems

Abstract: The major challenges in the Bayesian inverse problems arise from the need for repeated evaluations of the forward model, as required by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods for posterior sampling. Many attempts at accelerating Bayesian inference have relied on surrogates for the forward model, typically constructed through repeated forward simulations that are performed in an offline phase. Although such approaches can be quite effective at reducing computation cost, there has been little analysis of the ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the prior weighted L 2 -norm, then the approximate posterior converges to the exact posterior with at least the same rate [30,41]. This result has been improved recently in [46] where it was showed that the convergence rate of the posterior approximation is at least twice as large as the convergence rate of the surrogate, for general priors. However, constructing an accurate surrogate over the entire support of the prior might not be feasible and is in fact often unnecessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…the prior weighted L 2 -norm, then the approximate posterior converges to the exact posterior with at least the same rate [30,41]. This result has been improved recently in [46] where it was showed that the convergence rate of the posterior approximation is at least twice as large as the convergence rate of the surrogate, for general priors. However, constructing an accurate surrogate over the entire support of the prior might not be feasible and is in fact often unnecessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It also introduces some subtle theoretical and practical difficulties. From a theoretical standpoint, since the surrogate effectively changes every time it is updated (i.e., the forward model changes), standard convergence analyses and proofs of ergodicity and detailed balance found in the literature (e.g., Yan & Zhang, 2017) cannot be easily adopted. Given the numerical character of this work, here we do not attempt such analyses and/or proofs but acknowledge that a general description and validation of the method will require an in-depth study of these properties; we reserve this for a future study.…”
Section: Some Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the error and convergence analysis for surrogates in Bayesian inversion is far from complete (see e.g. [59,64] for recent studies), and requires further work.…”
Section: Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%