2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1174-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence and divergence of nutrient stoichiometry during forest litter decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decomposition rate constants used for non-woody foliage at pure stands were 0.31 yr −1 for Picea abies and 0.22 yr −1 for Fagus sylvatica, and at mixed stands 0.29 yr −1 for Picea abies and 0.24 yr −1 for Fagus sylvatica (Albers et al, 2004). This non-woody foliage derived decomposition rate constants are comparable to the lower end of litter decay constants of diverse tree species calculated from Table 1 in Homann (2012) amounting to 0.39-0.88 yr −1 , but are about one third higher than in situ derived decomposition rate constants of woody tissue of, for example, about 0.10 yr −1 (Johnson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Litter Erosion Flux (E X Org )supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Decomposition rate constants used for non-woody foliage at pure stands were 0.31 yr −1 for Picea abies and 0.22 yr −1 for Fagus sylvatica, and at mixed stands 0.29 yr −1 for Picea abies and 0.24 yr −1 for Fagus sylvatica (Albers et al, 2004). This non-woody foliage derived decomposition rate constants are comparable to the lower end of litter decay constants of diverse tree species calculated from Table 1 in Homann (2012) amounting to 0.39-0.88 yr −1 , but are about one third higher than in situ derived decomposition rate constants of woody tissue of, for example, about 0.10 yr −1 (Johnson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Litter Erosion Flux (E X Org )supporting
confidence: 67%
“…For C, there was a large decrease in the amount during decomposition, while the concentrations of C also decreased only slightly. Together these changes led to the convergence of litter C across species and the significant phylogenetic signals in initial litter C remained but became weaker during decomposition [ 18 ]. This matches the fact that chemical traits will become more and more similar across species with the progression of litter decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies mainly focused on litter chemical transformation of single species [ 11 16 ] or of litter mixtures [ 12 , 17 ]. Many of these studies found differences among elements or ecosystems concerned [ 4 , 10 , 12 , 17 ], but see [ 1 , 8 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, studies across many species comparing species traits to chemical litter transformation are still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the type of functional systematic group (like EGs and DAs), and of individual tree species, strongly interact with several factors, including climate, time since the change of tree species and soil intrinsic properties or management, while site properties often dominate (Augusto et al, 2001b;Binkley & Menyailo, 2005;Ladegaard-Pedersen et al, 2005;De Santo et al, 2009;Guckland et al, 2009;Berger, Inselsbacher & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, 2010;Chodak & Niklinska, 2010;Homann, 2012;McIntosh, Macdonald & Gundale, 2012;Prescott & Grayston, 2013;Vesterdal et al, 2013). These numerous interactions may be difficult to address and some have not been investigated using well-designed experiments.…”
Section: (3) Knowledge Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%