2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-015-9428-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence and superconvergence analyses of HDG methods for time fractional diffusion problems

Abstract: We study the hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method for the spatial discretization of time fractional diffusion models with Caputo derivative of order 0 < α < 1. For each time t ∈ [0, T ], the HDG approximations are taken to be piecewise polynomials of degree k ≥ 0 on the spatial domain Ω, the approximations to the exact solution u in the L ∞ 0, T ; L 2 (Ω)norm and to ∇u in the L ∞ 0, T ; L 2 (Ω) -norm are proven to converge with the rate h k+1 provided that u is sufficiently regular, where h is the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we need to show that the only solution to ahfalse(λh,μfalse)=01emfor all2.56804ptμL02false(hfalse) is λ h = 0. Taking μ = λ h in gives ahfalse(λh,λhfalse)=0. On the other hand, taking η = μ = λ h in implies ahfalse(λh,λhfalse)=false(sans-serifQλh,sans-serifPλhfalse)+sans-serifUλhλh,τfalse(sans-serifUλhλhfalse). Setting μ = λ h and w=sans-serifQλh in and summing over K ∈ Ω h , we get false(sans-serifPλh,sans-serifQλhfalse)=false(κsans-serifLfalse[sans-serifQλhfalse],sans-serifQλhfalse). Inserting into and using the resulting equation in , we get that false(κsans-serifLfalse[sans-serifQλhfalse],sans-serifQλhfalse)+sans-serifUλhλh,τfalse(sans-serifUλhλhfalse)=0. As in the proof of Lemma , the coercivity results in Mustapha and Schötzau, lemma 3.1(ii) and Mustapha et al, section 3, equation (9) imply the existence of a constant C > 0 such that …”
Section: The Hdg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we need to show that the only solution to ahfalse(λh,μfalse)=01emfor all2.56804ptμL02false(hfalse) is λ h = 0. Taking μ = λ h in gives ahfalse(λh,λhfalse)=0. On the other hand, taking η = μ = λ h in implies ahfalse(λh,λhfalse)=false(sans-serifQλh,sans-serifPλhfalse)+sans-serifUλhλh,τfalse(sans-serifUλhλhfalse). Setting μ = λ h and w=sans-serifQλh in and summing over K ∈ Ω h , we get false(sans-serifPλh,sans-serifQλhfalse)=false(κsans-serifLfalse[sans-serifQλhfalse],sans-serifQλhfalse). Inserting into and using the resulting equation in , we get that false(κsans-serifLfalse[sans-serifQλhfalse],sans-serifQλhfalse)+sans-serifUλhλh,τfalse(sans-serifUλhλhfalse)=0. As in the proof of Lemma , the coercivity results in Mustapha and Schötzau, lemma 3.1(ii) and Mustapha et al, section 3, equation (9) imply the existence of a constant C > 0 such that …”
Section: The Hdg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Cockburn and Mustapha, the HDG method for numerically solving subdiffusion fractional model problem of order ‐ α with −1 < α < 0 is analyzed. The spatial discretization of time fractional diffusion equation with Caputo derivative of order 0 < α < 1 is studied by HDG method . The author, Celiker, and Kurulay introduced an HDG method for a Bagley‐Torvik equation with a Dirichlet boundary conditions and for a class of fractional boundary value problem in Karaaslan et al and Karaaslan et al, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the coercivity results in Mustapha and Schötzau and Mustapha et al 7,8 and the condition of the kernels shown in Theorem 3.1 are given such that…”
Section: C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are generally applied for ordinary or partial differential equation in the literature. The number of papers in which the method is used for fractional differential equations are limited [6][7][8][9][10][11] So far, the application of the HDG method for fractional integro differential equation has not been observed in the literature. This paper is divided into five sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, numerical techniques have received an increasing attention for solution approximation of fractional order differential equations. Especially during the recent years, various numerical and computational methods, such as finite difference method, 14,15,[18][19][20] finite element method, 21,22 pseudo-spectral method, [23][24][25][26] and semi-analytical methods [27][28][29][30][31][32] have been developed and formulated for solving several types of constant and variable order fractional transport models. In recent decades, the meshless numerical methods have been introduced, developed, and well-used for solving many practical problems in applied sciences and engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%