2007
DOI: 10.1137/050646135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence in Nonlinear Filtering for Stochastic Delay Systems

Abstract: We study some approximation schemes for a nonlinear filtering problem when the state process X is the solution of a stochastic delay diffusion equation, and the observation process is a noisy function of X s for s ∈ [t − τ, t], where τ is a constant. The approximating state is given by means of an Euler discretization scheme, and the observation process is a noisy function of the approximating state.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result generalizes Proposition 4.2 in Calzolari et al [10], since it does not require the boundedness of the coefficients and (there denoted by a and b, respectively). We point out that Proposition 3 requires condition A1 to hold also for k = 2, while k = 1 is sufficient when t is bounded by a deterministic constant.…”
Section: Propositionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above result generalizes Proposition 4.2 in Calzolari et al [10], since it does not require the boundedness of the coefficients and (there denoted by a and b, respectively). We point out that Proposition 3 requires condition A1 to hold also for k = 2, while k = 1 is sufficient when t is bounded by a deterministic constant.…”
Section: Propositionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Proposition 3 can be proved in much the same way as the above quoted Proposition 4.2 from Section 5 of Calzolari et al [10], which deals with the onedimensional case; the boundedness assumption on the coefficients there is made only to get the upper bound (20). In the proof, which we briefly sketch below for the ease of the reader, we also consider the continuous Euler-Maruyama scheme, that is, the processes Z n = Z n t t∈ 0 T defined by Z n t = t for − ≤ t ≤ 0 and, for 0 ≤ t ≤ T , dZ n t = h · s/h h· s/h X n ds + h · s/h h· s/h X n dW s…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example we can consider the simple stochastic delay system of Remark 1.3. Taking into account this remark, the computation of the filter is equivalent to the computation of the filter of the stochastic delay system (13) and (14), for which the convergence result obtained in [5] can be applied. To our knowledge there are only two other papers dealing with the approximation of nonlinear filtering for delayed diffusion systems: Chang [10], and Twardowska, Marnik and Pas lawaska-Po luniak [22].…”
Section: Remark 13 the Case When The State Process Solves The Stochmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inspiring example can also be viewed as a particular case of the delay systems considered in (Calzolari et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%