2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2010.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of a gradient damage model toward a cohesive zone model

Abstract: The study starts from a specific gradient damage model which admits a closed-form solution in the case of uniaxial tension. It enables to separate the parameters of the model between a length scale, characteristic of nonlocal effects, and macroscopic parameters which retain their meaning in a cohesive crack setting. A convergence analysis is performed: the response of a cohesive zone model is retrieved when the length scale goes to zero while keeping the macroscopic parameters constant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that similar analysis concerning cohesive and gradient damage models has been performed by Lorentz in [6]. Thus, based on this equivalence, a method to derive a local damage behavior to use in TLS from any cohesive behavior will be exhibited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that similar analysis concerning cohesive and gradient damage models has been performed by Lorentz in [6]. Thus, based on this equivalence, a method to derive a local damage behavior to use in TLS from any cohesive behavior will be exhibited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicit method 0 < β ≤ 1 2 may be suitable for intermediate situations between a quasi-static and an explicit dynamic calculation. From (12), the determination of the the new accelerationü n+1 requires the knowledge of the new deformation state u n+1 which itself determines the new damage field at time t = t n+1 via (16). For the implicit Newmark method β = 0, (18) can thus be regarded as a nonlinear equation in u n+1 , where nonlinearity results from the irreversibility condition when minimizing the total energy (16).…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (12), the determination of the the new accelerationü n+1 requires the knowledge of the new deformation state u n+1 which itself determines the new damage field at time t = t n+1 via (16). For the implicit Newmark method β = 0, (18) can thus be regarded as a nonlinear equation in u n+1 , where nonlinearity results from the irreversibility condition when minimizing the total energy (16). To decouple the (u n+1 , α n+1 ) problem, we use a staggered time-stepping procedure as used in [13,14,25] among others.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations