2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-008-0170-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of a smoothing algorithm for symmetric cone complementarity problems with a nonmonotone line search

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a smoothing algorithm for solving the monotone symmetric cone complementarity problems (SCCP for short) with a nonmonotone line search. We show that the nonmonotone algorithm is globally convergent under an assumption that the solution set of the problem concerned is nonempty. Such an assumption is weaker than those given in most existing algorithms for solving optimization problems over symmetric cones. We also prove that the solution obtained by the algorithm is a maximally compleme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical results are listed in Table 2 From the numerical results listed in Table 1, we may see that Algorithm 3.1 works better with the non-monotone line search than the monotone line search in the sense that the former could find the optimizer more efficiently than the latter; and the former has less number of iterations and less CPU time than the latter for most cases. Moreover, by the numerical results in Tables 1 and 2, we may find that our non-monotone smoothing algorithm seems to be more effective than Huang-Hu-Han's algorithm [11]. These demonstrate that the non-monotone smoothing-type algorithm proposed in this paper has some advantages.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The numerical results are listed in Table 2 From the numerical results listed in Table 1, we may see that Algorithm 3.1 works better with the non-monotone line search than the monotone line search in the sense that the former could find the optimizer more efficiently than the latter; and the former has less number of iterations and less CPU time than the latter for most cases. Moreover, by the numerical results in Tables 1 and 2, we may find that our non-monotone smoothing algorithm seems to be more effective than Huang-Hu-Han's algorithm [11]. These demonstrate that the non-monotone smoothing-type algorithm proposed in this paper has some advantages.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For the non-monotone line search given in Algorithm 3.1, some basic results are included in the following lemma, whose proof can be found in Remark 3.4, [11].…”
Section: A L G O R I T H M 31 (A Non-monotone Smoothing-type Algoritmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On one hand, smoothing-type algorithms have been developed to solve symmetric cone complementarity problems (see, for example, [10][11][12][13][14]) and symmetric cone linear programming (see, for example, [15,16]). On the other hand, smoothing-type algorithms have also been developed to solve the system of inequalities under the order induced by n + (see, for example, [17][18][19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%