2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1064562406010194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of expansions in the root functions of periodic boundary value problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus (38) {λ n,1,ε , λ n,2,ε } ⊂ U n,1 ∪ U n,2 , U n,1 ∩ U n,2 = ∅, ∀n ≥ N 0 , ∀ε ∈ [0, 1], where λ n,j,ε is the eigenvalue of P ε satisfying (5). First we prove that if λ n,j,0 lies in U n,1 , then the normalized eigenfunctions ϕ * n,j (x) of S * corresponding to the eigenvalue λ n,j,0 satisfies…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus (38) {λ n,1,ε , λ n,2,ε } ⊂ U n,1 ∪ U n,2 , U n,1 ∩ U n,2 = ∅, ∀n ≥ N 0 , ∀ε ∈ [0, 1], where λ n,j,ε is the eigenvalue of P ε satisfying (5). First we prove that if λ n,j,0 lies in U n,1 , then the normalized eigenfunctions ϕ * n,j (x) of S * corresponding to the eigenvalue λ n,j,0 satisfies…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Now let us consider the operator A generated by the antiperiodic boundary conditions (2). Instead of (3), (5) and (8), we use (4), (6) where Φ n,j (x) is a normalized eigenfunction of A corresponding to the eigenvalue µ n,j ; and instead of (36) we take a family of operators A ε = B + ε(A − B), 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1, where B is the operator generated by the differential expression y (m) + (p 2,0 + p 2,2n+1 e i2π(2n+1)x + p 2,−2n−1 e −i2π(2n+1)x )y (m −2) and boundary conditions (2). Arguing as in the proof of Theorem 2, we get Theorem 3: Let µ n,1 , µ n,2 be the eigenvalues of A satisfying (6).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…because otherwise n would be an intermediate vertex with necessity, which is not possible for admissible walks by (12). Set…”
Section: Theorem 7 Let {ϕ K } Be a System Of Eigenfunctions And Assocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain classes of potentials, there have been given sufficient and necessary conditions on whether blocks could be split into (one-dimensional) eigenfunction decompositions [2,13,14,26]. Maybe, in 2006 Makin [12] and the authors [3,Theorem 71] gave first examples of such potentials that SEAF for periodic or antiperiodic boundary conditions is NOT a basis in L 2 ([0, π]) even though all but finitely many eigenvalues are simple. The existence of such potentials indirectly follows from the recent results in [8] as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%