2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of fracture process zone size in cohesive zone modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend was also noted in Refs. [19] and [20] for softening interactions involved in a DCB geometry and in the context of cohesive cracking [29]. The slow decrease in the CZ size during propagation agrees with the observation that the slope at the debond tip (B) increases while the plate deflection stays constant.…”
Section: Platesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This trend was also noted in Refs. [19] and [20] for softening interactions involved in a DCB geometry and in the context of cohesive cracking [29]. The slow decrease in the CZ size during propagation agrees with the observation that the slope at the debond tip (B) increases while the plate deflection stays constant.…”
Section: Platesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Because a crack path is unknown, a 4k structured mesh is initially utilized, and thus, the boundary of a 4k structured mesh does not correspond to a potential crack path, as shown in Figure A. The element size around the potential crack path region is 1 mm, which is small enough to capture the nonlinear fracture process zone . For the 4k structured mesh, the number of nodes is 9256, and the number of elements is 18 207.…”
Section: Mixed‐mode Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element size around the potential crack path region is 1 mm, which is small enough to capture the nonlinear fracture process zone. 47,54 For the 4k structured mesh, the number of nodes is 9256, and the number of elements is 18 207. Next, to investigate the effects of the element splits and the stress recovery on computational results, a finite element mesh is generated so that element boundaries are aligned to a potential crack path, which results in an aligned mesh ( Figure 21B).…”
Section: Four-point Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the predictions of the analytical model, we use the finite element software package ABAQUS [28] The length on the interface between crack initiation and total separation defines the cohesive zone length , which depends on the film thickness and a characteristic length that depends on the bulk material properties and the cohesive zone model parameters [29]. The characteristic length of the cohesive law is given by [30]:…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript N O T C O P Y E D I T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%