2003
DOI: 10.1002/0471475769.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence Problems in Logistic Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
133
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…I also look at how several SAS procedures handle the problem. This paper is a revised and updated version of Allison (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I also look at how several SAS procedures handle the problem. This paper is a revised and updated version of Allison (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the sample size of 90 border cells to be too small and therefore used a penalized maximum likelihood estimation. This method results in approximately unbiased estimates of coefficients even with small sample sizes and separation issues (Allison 2008;Firth 1993;Heinze and Schemper 2002). We built three separate models; the first model used all border crossing data by pooling both entry sites and exit sites, the second one used all entry crossings, and the third one used all exit crossings.…”
Section: Logistic Regression Models Using Penalized Maximum Likelihoomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, blood type compatibility was not included in the multivariate analysis because complications occurred in all pa- Original Article tients with incompatible matching (16). However, blood type mismatch is thought to be a strong risk factor for severe complications, with 100% specificity (17).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%