2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00280-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence properties and derivative extraction of the superconvergent Timoshenko beam finite element

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These equations may thus be expressed in terms of the known boundary values for θ and r leading to a finite element capable of providing the analytical solution. Specific to the interpolation obtained in this way is that it becomes dependent on the material and cross-sectional properties [2,3,5,6] as well as the loading functions μ(ξ ) and ν(ξ ) [8].…”
Section: Exact Representation Of the Solution In Terms Of Nodal Positmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These equations may thus be expressed in terms of the known boundary values for θ and r leading to a finite element capable of providing the analytical solution. Specific to the interpolation obtained in this way is that it becomes dependent on the material and cross-sectional properties [2,3,5,6] as well as the loading functions μ(ξ ) and ν(ξ ) [8].…”
Section: Exact Representation Of the Solution In Terms Of Nodal Positmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such exact interpolation has been also widely reported [2][3][4][5][6] and often praised for automatically eliminating the notorious shear-locking anomaly [4,7]. It turns out that there exist a number of forms which this interpolation can take, from a highly coupled one in which the displacement and the rotation field both depend on the nodal displacements and rotations as well as the problem geometric, material and loading data [2,3,5,8] to a completely uncoupled interpolation of the displacement and the rotation fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, the suggested FE can be used for both thick and thin beam. This FE was also proposed in [26][27][28][29]. Furthermore, Friedman and Kosmatka [30], Kosmatka [31] use this FE to solve dynamic and buckling problems, whereas in [32,33] thin-walled beam problems are studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These polynomials, belonging to the family of Hermitian shape functions, produce a superconvergent locking-free finite element [17,19,21]. In fact, when the beam slenderness goes to infinity, a proper parameter vanishes and the stiffness matrix of the element reduces to the classical Euler-Bernoulli stiffness matrix.…”
Section: 'Modified' Hermitian Shape Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If inner nodes are condensed out, it is easy to demonstrate [21] that the finite element n. 2 (L32) is characterized by both the same bending stiffness matrix [15] (see Appendix B) and nodal load vector as elements adopting Hermitian polynomials. On the other hand, element n. 1 (L21) coincides, for the flexural part, with the 'consistent interpolation Timoshenko beam element (CIE)' introduced by Reddy [19].…”
Section: Lagrangian Elements No 1 and 2 (L21 And L32)mentioning
confidence: 99%