1989
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(89)90094-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence properties of panel methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…makers [58], Katz and Plotkin [63], Oskam [88]). Such an O(h 2 ) super convergence was also noted by Bellamy-Knights et al [8] for the simulation of 2D potential flow about an elliptical cylinder for which they assumed that the phenomenon was probably due to error cancellation occurring only for convex body shapes. For our solid angle test case the unit strength dipole distribution, the exact solution being constant, and the evaluation of the solid angle in the panel mid point could also be factors contributing to this occurrence of super convergence.…”
Section: Solid Anglesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…makers [58], Katz and Plotkin [63], Oskam [88]). Such an O(h 2 ) super convergence was also noted by Bellamy-Knights et al [8] for the simulation of 2D potential flow about an elliptical cylinder for which they assumed that the phenomenon was probably due to error cancellation occurring only for convex body shapes. For our solid angle test case the unit strength dipole distribution, the exact solution being constant, and the evaluation of the solid angle in the panel mid point could also be factors contributing to this occurrence of super convergence.…”
Section: Solid Anglesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…straight-line panels of constant strength), the singularity strength and external velocity field converge only as 1/N. If, however, panel curvature is taken into account (maintaining constant panel strength) then the singularity strength and external velocity field converge as 1/N 2 These results led Bellamy-Knights et al [12] to re-examine the work of Hess [13]. Analysis of the velocity induced at the control point of a panel by that panel itself verified that panel curvature should be taken into account to allow the computed strength distribution and external velocity field to converge as 1/N 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Bellamy-Knights et al [12] compare the analytical singularity distributions presented here with the distributions predicted by panel methods of different order and for N = 16, 32, 64 and 128 where N is the number of panels. It is found numerically that for the 'zeroth'-order panel method (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Later papers, including those by his research students, further developed this theme (208)(209)(210)(211)(212)(213)(214) . However, by the late 1980s his attention turned to establishing exact analytical values of surface singularity distributions for potential flows about ellipses, thus providing bench-mark tests for the panel methods currently popular in aerodynamic calculations (215)(216)(217)(218)(219)(220) . In this he was joined initially by Jack Gerrard, the latter's research student Michael Benson, and Ian Gladwell of the Mathematics Department.…”
Section: The Department Of the Mechanics Of Fluids And Its Successorsmentioning
confidence: 99%