Markov Processes and Controlled Markov Chains 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0265-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence Property of Standard Transition Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the birth-death process is not strongly ergodic (see [10], [23], and [26]). Thus, by Theorem 3.1, the process is not strongly ergodic.…”
Section: Theorem 42 Assume That a = U∈s A(u) < ∞ Then The Q-procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the birth-death process is not strongly ergodic (see [10], [23], and [26]). Thus, by Theorem 3.1, the process is not strongly ergodic.…”
Section: Theorem 42 Assume That a = U∈s A(u) < ∞ Then The Q-procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that statements (i) and (ii) of Theorem 1.4 are equivalent (see [15], [16]) and so too are (iii) and (iv), by Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. To prove the equivalence of (ii) and (iii), we will compute T .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14 and An Application To Orthogonal Polynomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Remarks 2.5. (i) Under the restriction of stochastic monotonicity, [8] discusses the uniformly polynomial convergence for time-continuous Markov chains in terms of Feller transition functions. The convergence means that there exist two constants v > 0 and C > 0 so that sup i,j ∈E t v |p ij (t) − π j | ≤ C for all t ≥ 0.…”
Section: Corollary 24 a Regular Birth-death Process Is Strongly Ergmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that for birth-death processes, which are special cases of singlebirth processes, Theorem 1.1 and the second part of Theorem 1.2 have been obtained in [8] and [6] respectively, using a different approach. See Remark 2.5(i) and Remark 3.1(i) for further comments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%