1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00972006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence rate in integral limit theorem with stable limit law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the rate of convergence in (1.4) is related to that of (1.1). For reader's convenience we will clarify and augment certain Berry Esseen type results for the convergence of the total sum in (1.1), which are to be found in the work of Bergstr6m (1952b), Cram4r (1963, Satyabaldina (1972Satyabaldina ( , 1973, Paulauskas (1973), Christoph (1979Christoph ( , 1980, Hall (1981aHall ( , 1981b, Dubinskaite (1983) and Mijnheer (1987). Roughly speaking, the rates of convergence depend on how close the tails of F and G are to each other.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, the rate of convergence in (1.4) is related to that of (1.1). For reader's convenience we will clarify and augment certain Berry Esseen type results for the convergence of the total sum in (1.1), which are to be found in the work of Bergstr6m (1952b), Cram4r (1963, Satyabaldina (1972Satyabaldina ( , 1973, Paulauskas (1973), Christoph (1979Christoph ( , 1980, Hall (1981aHall ( , 1981b, Dubinskaite (1983) and Mijnheer (1987). Roughly speaking, the rates of convergence depend on how close the tails of F and G are to each other.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the proofs of (T.3), (T.4) and (T.5) we need the following fact which can be derived by successive integration by parts (see Christoph (1979), page 97, or Dubinskaite (1983), page 50, formula (17)). Whenever (1.14) holds for some k > 1, then…”
Section: ) -T DX = O(itlr/l(lt-ll) ) mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the description in (1)(2)(3)(4) holds for some constants α ∈ (0, 2), c > 1 and θ ∈ R and functions M L (·) and M R (·), then it can be shown that cy α (t) = y α (c 1/α t) + ibt, t ∈ R, for a suitable constant b ∈ R. Conversely, considering a nonvanishing characteristic function φ(t), let y(t) be the uniquely defined continuous complex-valued function such that y(0) = 0 and φ(t) = e y(t) , t ∈ R; see [2,Theorem 7.6.2]. If the functional equation cy(t) = y(qt) + ibt, t ∈ R, is satisfied for some constants c > 1, q > 1 and b ∈ R, which is a slight modification of the property that Lévy [11,Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the author's earlier results on St. Petersburg games, described in [3], Megyesi and the author [6] proved that if the underlying distribution function F of X is in the domain of geometric partial attraction of a semistable law of index α ∈ (0, 2), with a distribution function G α (·) given by (1)(2)(3)(4), then in fact a centering sequence c n and a norming sequence a n = n 1/α (1/n) can be explicitly specified for all n ∈ N, where (s), 0 < s < 1, is a right-continuous positive function that is slowly varying at zero, such that the corresponding full sequence V n is stochastically compact in distribution, and the class G α = {G α,κ (·) : 1 ≤ κ ≤ c} of its subsequential asymptotic distributions is parameterized by the values of some finite interval [1, c]. Here, if the original attracting G α (·) is determined by M L (·) and M R (·) in (2) and (3), then the semistable G α,κ (·) is determined by M L,κ (x) = M L (x/κ 1/α ), x < 0, and M R,κ (x) = M R,κ (x/κ 1/α ), x > 0, that satisfy (2) and (3) with the same multiplicative period c 1/α .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%