1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0266466600013189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence to Stochastic Integrals for Dependent Heterogeneous Processes

Abstract: This paper provides conditions to establish the weak convergence of stochastic integrals. The theorems are proved under the assumption that the innovations are strong mixing with uniformly bounded 2+ moments. Several applications of the results are given, relevant for the theories of estimation with I(1) processes, I(2) processes, processes with nonstationary variances, nearintegrated processes, and continuous time approximations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
199
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from (A:32), Lemma A.2 and Theorem 2.1 of Hansen (1992) Here the rst and second equalities follow from de nitions, the third one is obtained because These results can be established in exactly the same way as their counterparts in the proof of Theorem 2. Next consider the rst factor on the r.h.s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It follows from (A:32), Lemma A.2 and Theorem 2.1 of Hansen (1992) Here the rst and second equalities follow from de nitions, the third one is obtained because These results can be established in exactly the same way as their counterparts in the proof of Theorem 2. Next consider the rst factor on the r.h.s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The proof makes use of the following convergence results, see Hansen (1992) and Hamilton (1994). We have…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak convergence of the first terms follows from the weak convergence to stochastic integrals for sample covariances of i.i.d. processes, convergence of the second term follows from Hansen (1992), while the weak convergence of the third and fourth terms follows from Caner (1997). Finally, rearranging terms gives the result in the text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%