2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent evidence for a theory of rapid, automatic, and accurate sex ratio tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, a focus of the present work is to assess possible differences across stimuli that vary in content (sex, pet, and vehicle ratios), a potentially more subtle effect. Thus, although a power analysis based on prior research (Alt et al, 2019; Brandner et al, 2020) suggests a sample size of about 10, the more modest repeated measures design and potentially smaller effects of interest in the present study, led us to decide on a larger target sample size of 50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, a focus of the present work is to assess possible differences across stimuli that vary in content (sex, pet, and vehicle ratios), a potentially more subtle effect. Thus, although a power analysis based on prior research (Alt et al, 2019; Brandner et al, 2020) suggests a sample size of about 10, the more modest repeated measures design and potentially smaller effects of interest in the present study, led us to decide on a larger target sample size of 50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Certainly, claims of slight biases such as this should be assessed with consideration of error variance, and the current methodological paradigm (i.e., comparing sex-ratio perception with abilities to perceive other ratios) provides a useful context for doing so. Previous research suggests this could be a regression to the mean effect (Brandner et al, 2020). Because the effect occurs with a variety of ratio types, it is slightly less likely that there is a specific male-perception bias and more likely that ratio estimates (of any type) are anchored at a 50/50 split of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas ample theories imply sensitivity to group emergent properties (e.g., self-categorization and social-identity theories, social-dominance theory, evolutionary theories, theories of self-regard; Brandner et al, 2020; Leary & Baumeister, 2000; Mahadevan et al, 2019; Neuberg et al, 2010; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, 1985) and the importance of this sensitivity for behavior, the mediating role of actually perceiving such properties is only now being tested. For example, past work has found that representation in classrooms and in organizations affects individuals’ sense of belonging and ultimately their success (e.g., Cheryan et al, 2009; Mannix & Neale, 2005; Murphy et al, 2007; K.…”
Section: Advancing Research In People Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If our reversed-causality explanation for the negative association between sexual disgust and perceptions of mate availability is correct, the accuracy of our conscious perception of mate availability must be scrutinized more closely. Operational sex ratio may be a crude proxy at best, as it may fail to take into account many important factors that would likely be tracked by our minds, such as age distribution, proportion of mates that are married or pregnant, and local attitudes toward monogamy and casual sex (see Brandner et al, 2020 for a discussion of our evolved sex ratio tracking abilities). More effort should be dedicated to expanding the range of measures used to approximate actual mate availability.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%