2023
DOI: 10.1111/mms.13047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent evolution of skim feeding in baleen whales

Abstract: The evolutionary relationships of the pygmy right whale Caperea marginata, the smallest and most enigmatic of the living baleen whales (mysticetes), remain contentious. For 150 years, morphological analyses have allied Caperea with right whales based on their similar skim filter feeding strategies and shared cranial features like a tall braincase, highly arched rostrum, and elongate baleen plates (Beddard, 1901;Bisconti, 2012;Gray, 1871;McLeod et al., 1993). By contrast, molecular and some anatomical evidence-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ekdale et al's (2011) and our own works show that tympanoperiotic morphology is compatible with the mysticete taxonomic subdivisions adopted by a number of students (Bisconti et al, 2023;Boessenecker & Fordyce, 2016;El Adli et al, 2014;Churchill et al, 2011;Deméré et al, 2005). This taxonomic interpretation contrasts with most molecular results and some morphological and total evidence studies that support a close relationship of Caperea marginata and Balaenopteroidea, as well as a paraphyletic status for Eschrichtiidae, Balaenopteridae, and Balaenoptera ( Árnason et al, 2018;Dutoit et al, 2023;Lammers et al, 2019).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Remarksmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ekdale et al's (2011) and our own works show that tympanoperiotic morphology is compatible with the mysticete taxonomic subdivisions adopted by a number of students (Bisconti et al, 2023;Boessenecker & Fordyce, 2016;El Adli et al, 2014;Churchill et al, 2011;Deméré et al, 2005). This taxonomic interpretation contrasts with most molecular results and some morphological and total evidence studies that support a close relationship of Caperea marginata and Balaenopteroidea, as well as a paraphyletic status for Eschrichtiidae, Balaenopteridae, and Balaenoptera ( Árnason et al, 2018;Dutoit et al, 2023;Lammers et al, 2019).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Remarksmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Such a result finds corroboration in several morphologybased studies like those of Bisconti et al (2023Bisconti et al ( , 2017; Bisconti, Damarco, Mao, et al (2021), Boessenecker andEl Adli et al (2014). However, this result, again, contrasts with molecular phylogenies in which Caperea is not related to Balaenidae (Dutoit et al, 2023;Wolf et al, 2023). Moreover, earbone morphology supports the monophyly of Balaenomorpha (including Balaenoidea and Balaenopteroidea).…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation