2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-020-01493-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent upper bounds in global minimization with nonlinear equality constraints

Abstract: We address the problem of determining convergent upper bounds in continuous nonconvex global minimization of box-constrained problems with equality constraints. These upper bounds are important for the termination of spatial branch-and-bound algorithms. Our method is based on the theorem of Miranda which helps to ensure the existence of feasible points in certain boxes. Then, the computation of upper bounds at the objective function over those boxes yields an upper bound for the globally minimal value. A proof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, so-called upper bounding procedures have been developed that ensure Assumption 8.3 and, thus, termination of a branch-and-bound method by computing a convergent sequence of upper bounds, as for instance proposed in [20] for the purely inequality constrained case. For problems that also involve equality constraints we refer to [14]. These techniques can be adapted to multiobjective problems which is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Lemma 82mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, so-called upper bounding procedures have been developed that ensure Assumption 8.3 and, thus, termination of a branch-and-bound method by computing a convergent sequence of upper bounds, as for instance proposed in [20] for the purely inequality constrained case. For problems that also involve equality constraints we refer to [14]. These techniques can be adapted to multiobjective problems which is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Lemma 82mentioning
confidence: 99%