2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25150-9_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converging from Branching to Linear Metrics on Markov Chains

Abstract: We study the strong and strutter trace distances on Markov chains (MCs). Our interest in these metrics is motivated by their relation to the probabilistic LTL-model checking problem: we prove that they correspond to the maximal differences in the probability of satisfying the same LTL and LTL-x (LTL without next operator) formulas, respectively. The threshold problem for these distances (whether their value exceeds a given threshold) is NP-hard and not known to be decidable. Nevertheless, we provide an approxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though for a good evaluation of our heuristics more tests are needed, the current results seem promising. Moreover, in the light of [18,30], relating the probabilistic bisimilarity distance to the LTL-model checking problem as δ 1 (M, N ) ≥ |P M (ϕ) − P N (ϕ)|, for all ϕ ∈ LTL, our results might be used to lead saving in the overall model checking time. A deeper study of this topic will be the focus of future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though for a good evaluation of our heuristics more tests are needed, the current results seem promising. Moreover, in the light of [18,30], relating the probabilistic bisimilarity distance to the LTL-model checking problem as δ 1 (M, N ) ≥ |P M (ϕ) − P N (ϕ)|, for all ϕ ∈ LTL, our results might be used to lead saving in the overall model checking time. A deeper study of this topic will be the focus of future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is worth noting that Algorithm 1 runs in polynomial time in the size of its input. Computing the coupling structure C in line 4, can be performed in polynomial time in the size of M ⊕ N 0 [18,30]…”
Section: Consider the Following Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of stating whether the behavior of two processes is exactly the same or not, behavioral metrics measure the disparities in their behavior. Since, moreover, for verification purposes, the desired properties (and observable behavior) of processes are usually expressed in terms of modal formulae, logical characterizations of behavioral metrics have been thoroughly investigated [2,11,18,25,27]. As d X -privacy and weak anonymity are measures over privacy protection guarantees of mechanisms, we aim at providing logical characterizations of them by exploiting the characterizations of the behavioral metrics on the LMCs induced by those mechanisms.…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we also show how it is possible to define a real-valued semantics for formulae in L starting from their syntactic distance. From this, we obtain a logical characterization of weak anonymity in the classic sense of [2,27] (see Section 5 for a detailed description).…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation