2004
DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.3.424.1629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
36
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are not consistent with results from a number of laboratory and closed-road experimental studies (4,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) involving portable cell phones, but are consistent with other real-world studies Fig. 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are not consistent with results from a number of laboratory and closed-road experimental studies (4,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) involving portable cell phones, but are consistent with other real-world studies Fig. 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies suggest that conversing on a hands-free phone while driving may increase mental workload, (3)(4)(5) and decrease various aspects of driver performance. (4,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) Other studies (14,15) have reached a different conclusion, finding that driving performance during simple conversations or voice communications was equal or superior to baseline driving performance. These previous studies, however, were conducted either in a laboratory, a driving simulator, or on a test track, and were not validated using realworld driving data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the results demonstrate a significant interaction between error location in the visual field and auditory and visual distracters, indicating that both forms of distracter result in an increase in errors at more peripheral locations, which effectively narrows the attentional field. Researchers have reported that drivers miss more traffic signs, respond more slowly, 29 and are less likely to detect changes in the driving scene 30 when engaged in a secondary auditory task. Strayer and Johnson 29 also proposed that the locus of interference in such tasks is at a central cognitive site and that the secondary auditory task produces a form of inattentional blindness, whereby the secondary task draws attention from the visual scene to the auditory stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, lapses have been associated with motor vehicle and operator-related train accidents. [166][167][168] Additionally, persistent deficits in sustained attention can have far-reaching negative impacts on quality of life. Recently, several novel lines of research have suggested that it is possible to enhance sustained attention, which has important implications for reducing lapses and improving clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Modulating Sustained Attention Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%