2011
DOI: 10.5785/23-1-47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversation principles and second language utterances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, an advanced L2 user might not show equivalent pragmatic competence in executing and comprehending certain speech acts, in conversational functions, such as greetings and leave-taking, in refusing offers, declining invitations and in conversational management like back channeling and short responses (Eslami-Rasekh, 2005;Mohammed, 2012). Often, L2 users' misapplication of surface structure rules or pronouncing of words with strong first language (L1) accent are usually indulgently regarded as they usually only slow down the pace of the interaction as interlocutors mentally adjust in their bid to communicate and interpret each other's intentions (Kaburise, 2007). In such situations the more proficient users subconsciously apply communication organizing principles like the theory of speech acts (Searle, 1980), conversation maxims (Grice, 1989) and the relevance theory of Wilson & Sperber (2005)to move the conversation along.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an advanced L2 user might not show equivalent pragmatic competence in executing and comprehending certain speech acts, in conversational functions, such as greetings and leave-taking, in refusing offers, declining invitations and in conversational management like back channeling and short responses (Eslami-Rasekh, 2005;Mohammed, 2012). Often, L2 users' misapplication of surface structure rules or pronouncing of words with strong first language (L1) accent are usually indulgently regarded as they usually only slow down the pace of the interaction as interlocutors mentally adjust in their bid to communicate and interpret each other's intentions (Kaburise, 2007). In such situations the more proficient users subconsciously apply communication organizing principles like the theory of speech acts (Searle, 1980), conversation maxims (Grice, 1989) and the relevance theory of Wilson & Sperber (2005)to move the conversation along.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%