Conversational Agents for Health and Well-being Across the Life Course: Protocol for an Evidence Map

Abstract

Background Conversational agents, which we defined as computer programs that are designed to simulate two-way human conversation by using language and are potentially supplemented with nonlanguage modalities, offer promising avenues for health interventions for different populations across the life course. There is a lack of open-access and user-friendly resources for identifying research trends and gaps and pinpointing expertise across international centers. Objective Our aim is to provide an overview of all relevant evidence on conversational agents for health and well-being across the life course. Specifically, our objectives are to identify, categorize, and synthesize—through visual formats and a searchable database—primary studies and reviews in this research field. Methods An evidence map was selected as the type of literature review to be conducted, as it optimally corresponded to our aim. We systematically searched 8 databases (MEDLINE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Scopus; the Cochrane, ACM, IEEE, and Joanna Briggs Institute databases; and Google Scholar). We will perform backward citation searching on all included studies. The first stage of a double-stage screening procedure, which was based on abstracts and titles only, was conducted by using predetermined eligibility criteria for primary studies and reviews. An operational screening procedure was developed for streamlined and consistent screening across the team. Double data extraction will be performed with previously piloted data collection forms. We will appraise systematic reviews by using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Primary studies and reviews will be assessed separately in the analysis. Data will be synthesized through descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, and subgroup analysis (if appropriate) and through high-level maps such as scatter and bubble charts. The development of the searchable database will be informed by the research questions and data extraction forms. Results As of April 2021, the literature search in the eight databases was concluded, yielding a total of 16,351 records. The first stage of screening, which was based on abstracts and titles only, resulted in the selection of 1282 records of primary studies and 151 records of reviews. These will be subjected to second-stage screening. A glossary with operational definitions for supporting the study selection and data extraction stages was drafted. The anticipated completion date is October 2021. Conclusions Our wider definition of a conversational agent and the broad scope of our evidence map will explicate trends and gaps in this field of research. Additionally, our evidence map and searchable database of studies will help researchers to avoid fragmented research efforts and wasteful redundancies. Finally, as part of the Harnessing the Power of Conversational e-Coaches for Health and Well-being Through Swiss-Portuguese Collaboration project, our work will also inform the development of an international taxonomy on conversational agents for health and well-being, thereby contributing to terminology standardization and categorization. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/26680

Digital Tools in Behavior Change Support Education in Health and Other Students: A Systematic Review

“…A systematic search of the relevant literature took place in seven international databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SAGE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library and with backward citation by manually searching the reference lists of all the articles included [ 28 ]. If individual records were not fully available or additional information about the results was required, we contacted the authors of the articles.…”

Usability Evaluation by Primary Care Providers of a Novel Digital Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management in Older Adults

“…Few papers included in meta-research on AC have evaluated usability, much less using established methods. 9 The literature offers examples of usability studies for ACAs, [34][35][36][37] which have used questionnaires for assessing usability, either as a single method 37 or combined with other approaches. 35,36 Notably, non-validated questionnaires were used to assess aspects such as satisfaction and ease of use, rendering direct comparison of results meaningless.…”

“…8 One promising area in mobile health is anthropomorphic conversational agents (ACAs). 9 A systematic review on the effectiveness of these virtual humans in patient-facing systems meta-analyzed 44 primary health outcome measures from 26 controlled studies. 10 The meta-analysis favored significantly the virtual human interventions, with moderate heterogeneity in study results.…”

Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes via an Anthropomorphic Conversational Agent: Development of an Evidence and Theory-Based Multi-Behavior Intervention

“…Conversational agents, defined as computer programmes designed to simulate two-way human conversation using language (speech and/or text), potentially supplemented with non-language modalities are regarded as a promising approach to support diabetes self-management ( Guerreiro et al, 2021 ). They may, for example, be more user friendly for people with lower literacy.…”