2020
DOI: 10.1108/jcom-11-2019-0145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversational agents in online organization–stakeholder interactions: a state-of-the-art analysis and implications for further research

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to review the extant literature on chatbots and stakeholder interactions to identify major trends and shed light on knowledge gaps.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review was conducted combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. A code book based on early systematic literature reviews was developed and used to extract information from 62 discrete peer-reviewed English articles. An inductive approach was used to analyse definitions of chatbots, topics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Chatbots are a prominent AI-based technology, and as such in principle addressed by the broader concern for ethics and privacy in technology research in general and in AI-based technology in particular. Nevertheless, as noted in a review of the chatbot literature, there has been an initial lack of ethical discussion in chatbot research [102]-though noteworthy exceptions to this exist, such as the exploration of ethical and social considerations for conversational AI by Ruane et al [91]. The ethical discussion in chatbot research may, however, be gaining traction motivated, for example, by Bender et al's [9] critical overview of ethical risks pertaining to large language models.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chatbots are a prominent AI-based technology, and as such in principle addressed by the broader concern for ethics and privacy in technology research in general and in AI-based technology in particular. Nevertheless, as noted in a review of the chatbot literature, there has been an initial lack of ethical discussion in chatbot research [102]-though noteworthy exceptions to this exist, such as the exploration of ethical and social considerations for conversational AI by Ruane et al [91]. The ethical discussion in chatbot research may, however, be gaining traction motivated, for example, by Bender et al's [9] critical overview of ethical risks pertaining to large language models.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this three-level hierarchy is not representative of the findings of this survey. In fact, Syvänen and Valentini [122] demonstrate that terms like chatbot, virtual assistant, agent, conversational bot or even robot are used without an explicit definition in the majority of studies. And when a definition is provided, they are generally used indistinctly among literature with varied definitions, whose differences are not significant.…”
Section: Terminology (F1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we focus on these definitions and the descriptors used, they are generally described as computer programmes [122], tools [98] or software systems [30,94] which are capable of simulating a human conversation [103,107,126] using natural language [56,70] or even artificial intelligence techniques [84,98]. Additionally, they are also occasionally described as voice or text interfaces [39,98] providing access to a set of services or functionalities [61,103].…”
Section: Terminology (F1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Su función se fundamenta en tres áreas como: canal de interacción, experiencia de usuario y ejecución de respuesta estas se demuestran en la Figura 2 (Syvänen y Valentini, 2020).…”
Section: Funcionalidad De Un Agente Conversacionalunclassified