2002
DOI: 10.1080/0390670022000012477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversational Heuristic as a Reflexive Method for Feminist Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I interviewed the 22 respondents with qualitative in-depth interviews (Aull Davies, 2008;Diaz, 2002). The data collection and analysis partly used the inductive grounded theory approach (Glaser and Strauss, 1967).…”
Section: The Sample and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I interviewed the 22 respondents with qualitative in-depth interviews (Aull Davies, 2008;Diaz, 2002). The data collection and analysis partly used the inductive grounded theory approach (Glaser and Strauss, 1967).…”
Section: The Sample and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the negative effects of bias the ethnographer must make specific biases explicit and must have an open mind (Pellatt, 2003). The use of a self-reflexive research process not only provided new insights but also provided information about how the knowledge emerged (Diaz, 2002).…”
Section: Position Of the Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recognized that the interview will be affected and shaped by the interaction between both interview participants (King, 1992). The interaction between the interviewer and the interviewee not only determines what meanings emerge but also moves the meanings forward and leads to new meanings (Diaz, 2002). This process is referred to as reflexive heuristics and "is based on the idea that meanings are created in the very process of verbalizing experiences or observing other people's lives" (Diaz, 2002, p. 253).…”
Section: Position Of the Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But I doubt that in our wildest dreams we ever imagined we would have to reinvent both science and theorizing itself to make sense of women's social experience. (Harding, 1996, p. 217) The contribution of feminism to social and health sciences was not limited to bringing previously hidden relations to the spotlight, or to unmasking partial conclusions; the way we research was also put into question (Díaz, 2002).…”
Section: ■ ■ Is There a Common Theme In The Science Of Difference?mentioning
confidence: 99%