Conversational Silencing of Racism in Psychological Science: Toward Decolonization in Practice

Abstract

This article addresses a paradox between self-perceptions of psychology as a liberal, progressive, antiracist discipline and profession and the persistent criticisms of racism and calls for decolonization. It builds on the criticisms of epistemic exclusion and White centering, arguing that White supremacy is maintained by “conversational silencing” in which the focus on doing good psychology systematically draws attention away from the realities of racism and the operation of power. The process is illustrated by investigations of disciplinary discourse around non-Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic psychology and on stereotyping, racism, and prejudice reduction, which constitute the vanguard of liberal scholarship in the discipline. This progressive scholarship nurtures “White ignorance,” an absence of belief about systemic racism that psychology plays a part in upholding.

Perspective Matters: A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Racial Prejudice

“…WEIRD populations often lack representation from a wide range of racial or ethnic backgrounds. As identi ed by Durrheim (2023), progressive calls such as 'WEIRD' exclude conversations around race, suggesting an extension of the term to white and western populations. As such, various measurement and sampling-related biases emerged in the review, underscoring the current limitations in external validity within the existing studies.…”

A false peace: Bringing racism and race into peace scholarship in the metropole.

“…They argue that a focus on racialized violence and racism-informed research contributes to the work of peace and conflict scholars. Moreover, more recently, Durrheim (2024) pointed out that the issue of racial silence extends to the field of Western psychology writ large, shaping dynamics in the field and knowledge production. This scholarship provides essential pathways toward rectifying ongoing omissions and points to the need for further synthesis and theorizing to build the groundwork for this critical scholarship.…”

Accelerating African neuroscience to provide an equitable framework using perspectives from West and Southern Africa

“…Including multicultural populations in research not only enhances the validity and generalisability of cognitive phenomena, but also introduces important social dimensions to neuroscience research. Recent progressive calls towards non-'WEIRD' (western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic) 20 science, for example, excludes a conversation on race by omitting the bias in using majority white population groups 21 . Including important cross-cultural comparisons in social-cognitive neuroscience extends the use of the catchphrase 'WEIRD' to include biases in white and western populations.…”