Conversations about End of Life: Perspectives of Nursing Home Residents, Family, and Staff

Abstract

Background: Care in nursing homes (NHs) often overlooks individual values and preferences. Residents' voices are critical to discussions about preferences, yet there remains limited research on conversations about the end of life (EOL) from the perspective of older adults who reside in NHs. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the communication, content and process, related to EOL conversations among residents, family, and staff. Methods: We used semistructured interviews in this qualitative, descriptive study to describe conversations about EOL preferences. We examined participants' conversation, when it occurred, and what was discussed. We queried about barriers to and facilitators in discussing EOL care in the NH setting. We interviewed residents (n = 16), family (n = 12), and interdisciplinary staff (n = 10) from four NHs. Results: The overarching theme-missed conversations-describes EOL-related communication. Residents, families, and staff rarely talked about EOL care preferences, nor did they pass along information about preferences or initiate conversations about EOL care with each other. Three categories explained missed conversations: inquiry (''No one asked''); assumptions (presence of an advance directive [AD], ''They know me''); and conveying (lack of conveying information or wishes). Existing barriers and lacking facilitators resulted in missed opportunities to hold conversations about EOL preferences. Conclusions: Not all residents wanted to have conversations, but many wanted to be asked about their preferences. Missed conversations may adversely affect the quality of EOL care. Conversations with residents can be initiated by asking residents who they would like involved in the conversation and drawing upon the experience of others.

Quality of life of older persons in nursing homes after the implementation of a knowledge‐based palliative care intervention

“…Frail older persons are often excluded from research (Lloyd‐Williams, Kennedy, Sixsmith, & Sixsmith, ; Smedbäck et al, ; Ternestedt & Franklin, ; Towsley, Hirschman, & Madden, ), and this study is one of few intervention studies on palliative care in nursing homes reporting outcomes for residents. However, this study poses some methodological problems that will be discussed below.…”

Evaluating person‐centredness for frail older persons in nursing homes before and after implementing a palliative care intervention

“…We would like to discuss some of them. Frail older persons are commonly excluded from research due to their vulnerable position (Smedbäck et al, ; Ternestedt & Franklin, ; Towsley, Hirschman, & Madden, ). However, as the proportion of frail older people increases, the importance of developing research‐based knowledge about good care increases.…”

What do hospital professionals report as helping in overcoming obstacles for ACP decision-making? A qualitative study

“…A first argument is that an important goal of ACP decision-making is guaranteeing continuation of care throughout the different care settings [3]. Second, in order to prevent hospital admissions for palliative patients, health services often focus on the implementation of ACP in the primary care setting and nursing homes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, still many palliative patients reside and die in the hospital setting [12][13][14][15][16].…”