Conversations Over Video Conferences: An Evaluation of the Spoken Aspects of Video-Mediated Communication

Abstract

Recent trends toward telecommuting, mobile work, and wider distribution of the work force, combined with reduced technology costs, have made video communications more attractive as a means of supporting informal remote interaction. In the past, however, video communications have never gained widespread acceptance. Here we identify possible reasons for this by exarnining how the spoken characteristics of video-mediated communication differ from face-to-face interaction, for a series of real meetings. We evaluate two wide-area systems. One uses readily available Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) lines but suffers the limitations of transmission lags, a half-duplex line, and poor quality video. The other uses optical transmission

The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring

“…Prior work shows that ongoing communication in virtual contexts using information and communication technology (ICT) is inferior to face-to-face interaction in updating common ground (De Meyer 1991, Kraut et al 1988, McGuire et al 1987. There is consensus that ICT media, even videoconferencing, remain limited in terms of bandwidth (Daft and Lengel 1986, DohertySneddon et al 1997, O'Connail et al 1993 and are relatively ineffective in coordinating complex, ill-defined tasks with high interdependence (for reviews, please see Kraut et al 2002, Olson et al 2002.…”

The impact of head movements on user involvement in mediated interaction

“…Measures of conversation structure include some nonverbal behaviours such as the number and length of speaker exchanges and the number of pauses and interruptions in free speech (U. . A common finding in the literature is that faceto-face conversations result in more turns, shorter lengths of turn and more interruptions than audio-only or videomediated dialogues (O'Conaill, Whittaker, & Wilbur, 1993;Sellen, 1995). The interpretation of these findings has been that nonverbal behaviour or visual signals are important, thus face-to-face communication is less formal, with more interruptions (simultaneous speech) and fewer formal handovers of turns (Beattie & Barnard, 1979;Ellis &Beattie, 1986 andRutter &Stephenson, 1977).…”

Supporting Collaborative Learning in Videoconferencing Using Collaboration Scripts and Content Schemes

“…During videoconferencing, the synchronous interaction of the learners can be guided by the transmission of audio, video, and data. Studies on the influence of videoconference systems in small groups show the importance of the quality of the audio transmission (O'Connaill, Whittaker & Wilbur, 1993): The collaboration scenario will only work if the audio transmission is reliable, specifically if sound bytes are not lost and audio delays are not more than 500ms (cf. Finn, Sellen & Wilbur, 1997;O'Connaill et al, 1993).…”