2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0622-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of dissolved phosphorus in runoff by ferric sulfate to a form less available to algae: Field performance and cost assessment

Abstract: Conversion of dissolved P by ferric sulfate into a particulate form sparingly available to algae was studied in 15 ditches in Finland using stand-alone dispensers for ferric sulfate administration. Ferric sulfate typically converted 60–70 % of dissolved P into iron-associated form, a process which required 250–650 kg per kg dissolved P. Mean cost was 160 EUR per kg P converted (range 20–400 EUR kg−1). The costs were lowest at sites characterized by high dissolved P concentrations and small catchment area. At b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect of crop rotation on crop nutrient uptake (Venkatesh et al, 2017) was also verified in our study: spring wheat had better N and P uptake in CR2 and CR4 than in CR1 with both tillage conditions, the effect being even higher in notillage conditions as also reported by Malhi and Lemke (2007). Higher nutrient balance increases the risk of nutrient leaching (Uusitalo et al, 2015;Turtola et al, 2017) which can be prevented with proper crop rotation (Kayser et al, 2010), tillage method (Wang et al, 2015) and successful crop protection (Delin et al, 2008;Kauppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Crop Rotation Strategysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The positive effect of crop rotation on crop nutrient uptake (Venkatesh et al, 2017) was also verified in our study: spring wheat had better N and P uptake in CR2 and CR4 than in CR1 with both tillage conditions, the effect being even higher in notillage conditions as also reported by Malhi and Lemke (2007). Higher nutrient balance increases the risk of nutrient leaching (Uusitalo et al, 2015;Turtola et al, 2017) which can be prevented with proper crop rotation (Kayser et al, 2010), tillage method (Wang et al, 2015) and successful crop protection (Delin et al, 2008;Kauppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Crop Rotation Strategysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Turtola et al [37] study, higher N-balance (nitrogen applied as in fertilize/manurenitrogen harvested in grain (yield)) increase the risk of nitrogen leaching. Similarly, in Uusitalo et al [53] study, values of phosphorus in soil tests change over time affected by the reduction of P-balance and the reduction of soil P level decreases the risk of phosphorus leaching. As pests disturb crop growth causing significant yield losses and increasing the positive nutrient balance, this probably also increases the risk of nutrient leaching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Even though pests and their effect to crop yield has been an object of interest in agricultural studies for decades, the effect of pests on nutrient yield harvested in grain yield is seldom reported. There is, however, an urgent need to reduce nutrient leaching from field to surface water [30,[51][52][53]. Crop nutrient uptake efficiency related to nutrients applied as fertilizer is one indicator for the risk of nutrient leaching especially outside growing season [33,42,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the sites (Kakskerta and Nautela) had chemically assisted P precipitation, with aluminium chloride solution (trade name Kempac 18) at Kakskerta and granular ferric sulphate (Fe2(SO4)3, trade name Ferix-3) at Nautela being added into the water entering the CWs. This chemical treatment has been performed for 9 years at Kakskerta (since 2003), with the exception of occasional interruptions, and for 1.5 years at Nautela (since 2011; see Uusitalo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%