2020
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202001026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion‐Type MnO Nanorods as a Surprisingly Stable Anode Framework for Sodium‐Ion Batteries

Abstract: The emergence of nanomaterials in the past decades has greatly advanced modern energy storage devices. Nanomaterials can offer high capacity and fast kinetics yet are prone to rapid morphological evolution and degradation. As a result, they are often hybridized with a stable framework in order to gain stability and fully utilize its advantages. However, candidates for such framework materials are rather limited, with carbon, conductive polymers, and Ti-based oxides being the only choices; note these are all in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion coefficient D can be calculated according to D =4π iVmAFZA2[]dEdδ/dEdt2, where i is applied constant electric current, V m is the molar volume of active material, A is the total contact area between electrolyte and electrodes, F is Faraday constant, Z A is the valence of the species, d E /dδ is the slope of the coulometric titration curve, and t is the time duration of the constant current pulse. [ 43 ] Figure 4d shows the GITT test curves of the MnS‐MoS 2 heterostructure, the bare MnS, and the bare MoS 2 respectively. The calculated diffusion coefficient of MnS‐MoS 2 heterostructure is in the range of 10 −14 –10 −13 cm 2 s −1 , an order of magnitude larger than the diffusion coefficient of the pure MnS (10 −16 –10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ) and pure MoS 2 (10 −15 –10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion coefficient D can be calculated according to D =4π iVmAFZA2[]dEdδ/dEdt2, where i is applied constant electric current, V m is the molar volume of active material, A is the total contact area between electrolyte and electrodes, F is Faraday constant, Z A is the valence of the species, d E /dδ is the slope of the coulometric titration curve, and t is the time duration of the constant current pulse. [ 43 ] Figure 4d shows the GITT test curves of the MnS‐MoS 2 heterostructure, the bare MnS, and the bare MoS 2 respectively. The calculated diffusion coefficient of MnS‐MoS 2 heterostructure is in the range of 10 −14 –10 −13 cm 2 s −1 , an order of magnitude larger than the diffusion coefficient of the pure MnS (10 −16 –10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ) and pure MoS 2 (10 −15 –10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other peak at 0.07 V corresponds to the formation of alloy Na x Sn (eq ). In the initial anodic scan, the peaks ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 V are related to the desodiation processes of Na x Sn. , The other two small peaks at 1.14 and 2.0 V are attributed to the oxidation of Sn and Mn, respectively (eqs and ). , Figure S9b shows the XRD patterns of the Sn@Mn 2 SnO 4 -NC electrode after discharge and charge. The peaks of Mn and Na x Sn can be found at the state of discharge to 0.01 V, indicating the intercalation of Na + .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of portable electronic products and electric vehicles, lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) have attracted great interest. [ 1 ] Unfortunately, owing to the limited specific capacity of commercial electrode materials (such as graphite), the current LIBs cannot meet the growing demand. Thus, numerous researches have been carried out for the purpose of developing electrode materials with superior energy density, long cycle life, and fast charging features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%