SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005 2005
DOI: 10.1190/1.2148304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converted‐wave azimuthal anisotropy in a carbonate foreland basin

Abstract: In an onshore example from a carbonate basin, an embedded multicomponent test exhibits good PS-wave signal quality at the depth of interest, and all the expected characteristics of converted waves in azimuthally anisotropic media. In particular, there are clear azimuthal polarity reversals on the transverse receiver component, separated by null amplitudes defining the symmetry planes of the natural coordinate system; azimuthal velocity variations on the radial component then distinguish the specific symmetry p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the methods used to analyse seismic anisotropy indicated a sediment column with properties consistent with a HTI symmetry. The orientations of S1 , the fast S ‐wave polarization, were determined by analysis of the variations in amplitude and traveltime ‘pull‐up’ of the radial component, as also described by Mattocks et al (2005) and Bale et al (2009), and the sense of rotation on particle motion plots for each OBS receiver. Transverse component records and particle motion plots suggested a consistent S1 orientation at each OBS that did not appear to change significantly within the depth range investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the methods used to analyse seismic anisotropy indicated a sediment column with properties consistent with a HTI symmetry. The orientations of S1 , the fast S ‐wave polarization, were determined by analysis of the variations in amplitude and traveltime ‘pull‐up’ of the radial component, as also described by Mattocks et al (2005) and Bale et al (2009), and the sense of rotation on particle motion plots for each OBS receiver. Transverse component records and particle motion plots suggested a consistent S1 orientation at each OBS that did not appear to change significantly within the depth range investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its amplitude fluctuates regularly with the orientation of the polarization of the S-type transducer, the arrival of the C 1 -wave was identified in the polarized experiment (Fig. 2) (Mattocks et al 2005;Bale et al 2009). However, our laboratory data failed to identify and isolate the C 2 -wave event due to the entanglement of the arrivals of C 2 -and S 1 -waves.…”
Section: Polarized Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is widely recognized that a polarized shear wave splits into two shear waves in an anisotropic medium. 2) (Mattocks et al 2005;Bale et al 2009). The one that travels with a faster velocity tends to polarize parallel to the isotropic plane of a transverse isotropy Figure 5 The dotted curve and the dashed curve show the azimuthal variations of P-and C 1 -waves reflectivity strengths.…”
Section: Polarized Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li, 1998;Mattocks et al, 2005;Sil et al, 2009). The P-wave path could be expected to experience smoothly varying velocity with azimuth.…”
Section: Azimuthal Anisotropy and Shallow Ps Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%