2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converted‐Wave Static Correction Method for Thick Weathering Area

Abstract: In P‐SV seismic data processing, there are some aspects different from conventional P‐P seismic data processing, such as S‐wave static correction, CCP binning, P‐SV velocity analysis and migration. Among them, the most difficult procedure is S‐wave static correction. Unlike P‐wave velocity, the S‐wave velocity is almost unaffected by the water table and generally very low. Hence, the P‐wave and S‐wave static solutions are largely different from each other, sometimes S‐wave statics is near ten times of P‐waves.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One category is data-based methods, including the common receiver point (CRP) stack-power optimization method (Cary and Eaton, 1993) and Monte-Carlo simulated annealing (Eaton et al, 1991). Where geological structures are not complex, the CRP stackpower optimization method gives good results, whereas, Monte-Carlo simulated annealing gives a fairly good solution but is computationally expensive (Li et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One category is data-based methods, including the common receiver point (CRP) stack-power optimization method (Cary and Eaton, 1993) and Monte-Carlo simulated annealing (Eaton et al, 1991). Where geological structures are not complex, the CRP stackpower optimization method gives good results, whereas, Monte-Carlo simulated annealing gives a fairly good solution but is computationally expensive (Li et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%