2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.023543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converting nonrelativistic dark matter to radiation

Abstract: Dark matter in the cosmological concordance model is parametrized by a single number, describing the covariantly conserved energy density of a nonrelativistic fluid. Here we test this assumption in a modelindependent and conservative way by considering the possibility that, at any point during the cosmological evolution, dark matter may be converted into a noninteracting form of radiation. This scenario encompasses, but is more general than, the cases where dark matter decays or annihilates into these states. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the bounds on the Hubble parameter obtained in this way assume that the value of N eff is the same at BBN time (relevant for helium bounds) and CMB times (relevant for the sound horizon). Models in which extra radiation is created only after BBN (like the sterile neutrino model of [14] or the Dark Matter converting into Dark Radiation model of [20]) naturally evade combined BAO+deuterium+helium bounds on H 0 , and can potentially accommodate arbitrary large H 0 values as long as they also agree with CMB and LSS data.…”
Section: λCdm + N Eff Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the bounds on the Hubble parameter obtained in this way assume that the value of N eff is the same at BBN time (relevant for helium bounds) and CMB times (relevant for the sound horizon). Models in which extra radiation is created only after BBN (like the sterile neutrino model of [14] or the Dark Matter converting into Dark Radiation model of [20]) naturally evade combined BAO+deuterium+helium bounds on H 0 , and can potentially accommodate arbitrary large H 0 values as long as they also agree with CMB and LSS data.…”
Section: λCdm + N Eff Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a statistically significant tension currently exists between the value of H now obtained from local probes of the cosmic expansion rate (including not only Type Ia supernova data [35][36][37], but also lensing time-delay experiments [38,39]) and the value inferred from CMB data in the context of a ΛCDM cosmology [40][41][42][43]. Dark-matter decays between t LS and t now have been posited as one possible [44][45][46][47][48] way of alleviating these tensions. While it has not been our aim in this paper to address this tension, it is likely that the DDM framework can serve to alleviate these tensions in new and interesting ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the axions produced by the axino NLSP decay will constitute 'dark radiation', i.e., ultrarelativistic and invisible species with respect to the cold DM measured by Planck. The amount of dark radiation is under stringent constraints [53][54][55][56][57], and as a consequence it gives a small contribution to the total DM density. A quantity that will be useful along this work is the fraction of axino NLSP that decays into dark radiation.…”
Section: Relic Density For Multicomponent Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magenta regions in both panels are excluded by cosmological observations for DDM models [53][54][55][56][57], taking in to account the stringent constraints on the fraction of axino NLSP relic density that decays to dark radiation, f DM ddm . Usually these constraints are presented as upper limits for this fraction, which are then translated into upper limits on fã, for a fixed r 3/2 according to Eq.…”
Section: Constraints From Cosmological Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%