Converting qualitative data into quantitative values using a matched mixed‐methods design: A new methodological approach

Abstract

BackgroundQuantifying qualitative data as part of mixed‐methods research (MMR) can add to the study results' analysis. Comparable results may reinforce the conclusions, while differences hold an opportunity for an in‐depth discussion. To date, there is little guidance for researchers seeking to quantify their qualitative data.ObjectivesDescribing conversion of qualitative data to quantitative values, comparison with matched questionnaire results, discussing the benefits of this process and the matched MMR design.MethodsWe describe in detail how qualitative data from 46 interviews were converted into quantitative values (i.e., quantitative–qualitative values, QQVs) using MMR design, enabling a comparison of results from interviews and questionnaires obtained from the same participants. This process was embedded in a larger MMR study on family‐caregivers caring for people‐with‐end‐stage‐dementia conducted between the years 2020–2021.ResultsA QQV was generated for three main themes and compared to the questionnaires' scores regarding the same topics. There were no significant differences between the scores regarding ‘satisfaction with nurses and physicians care’, and ‘discussion with nurses and physicians about end‐of‐life care’. However, for ‘burden’, the QQV score was significantly higher than the questionnaires' score.DiscussionWe described how to use a matched MMR design to produce and compare QQV from interviews with questionnaire scores. This methodology may allow further valuable discussion if the results are either similar or not, and for better integration and easier presentation of the results. Comparable results can reinforce the conclusions from both parts of the MMR study, while differences hold an opportunity for an in‐depth discussion regarding their meaning and context. Although we claim that this methodology can be embedded in the MMR structure and contribute significantly to the discussion's depth, it by no means replaces the traditional MMR design.Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Learning from the working from home experiment during COVID-19: employees motivation to continue working from home

“…Codes were then interpreted quantitatively by cross tabulating against the demographic variables, to see if this could enhance the presentation of the results or identify and confirm any patterns (Halevi Hochwald et al, 2023). However, no significant relationships were identified, and as such, it was decided not to include quantitative data for the themes generated, which can often cause a loss of meaning due to an arbitrary assignment of values or losing important relationships and patterns through reducing data to a single dimension (Halevi Hochwald et al, 2023;Hanbury et al, 2011;Miles & Huberman, 1994).…”

Understanding Clinical Learning Quality Aspects in Mental Health Nursing Practice Course among Students: A Comprehensive Examination

“…An additional limitation is the study’s reliance on self-reported questionnaires to evaluate perceptions of learning quality, for the possibility of response bias and subjectivity. Future research could incorporate objective measures or observational methods to complement self-reported data, or use a complex mixed-method design [ 40 ] providing a more holistic understanding of clinical learning quality.…”

Understudied phenomena and emerging methodologies in nursing and midwifery: What's new on the horizon?

“…Additionally, this special issue highlights unique ways of studying well-established phenomena, including methodologies borrowed and adapted from other disciplines, as well as new methodologies withnursingastheontologicalbase.Asnursingresearchadvances, emerging methodologies are playing a pivotal role in reshaping the future of healthcare. The adoption of clique percolation (Lee et al, 2023) and netnography methods (Smith et al, 2023) Furthermore, novel methods to convert qualitative data into quantitative values (Halevi Hochwald et al, 2023) or reduce retraumatization of researchers and nurses taking part in important longitudinal studies (Conolly et al, 2023) hold great promise for the nursing profession. Halevi Hochwald et al ( 2023) described the benefits and methods of translating qualitative data to quantitative values using a matched mixed method research design.…”

“…Halevi Hochwald et al ( 2023) described the benefits and methods of translating qualitative data to quantitative values using a matched mixed method research design. They suggested that this methodology allows for further valuable discussion within research papers and allows better integration and easier presentation of results (Halevi Hochwald et al, 2023). Conolly et al (2023) critically evaluated the concepts of harm and retraumatization in the research process and explored the ethical consequences of carrying out research in relation to distressing topics.…”