2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2014.7037443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex-concave procedure for weighted sum-rate maximization in a MIMO interference network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the dual link algorithm is highly scalable and suitable for distributed implementation, which is briefly discussed in this paper. The centralized version of dual link algorithm for total power constraint has been generalized to multiple linear constraints using a minimax approach [14], and has stimulated the design of another monotonic convergent algorithm based on convexconcave procedure [15] which has slower convergence but can handle nonlinear convex constraints. Nevertheless, the dual link algorithm uses a different derivation approach, which is based on the optimal transmit signal structure, and easily leads a low 1 2 3 T X 1 T X 2 R X 1 R X 2 Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the dual link algorithm is highly scalable and suitable for distributed implementation, which is briefly discussed in this paper. The centralized version of dual link algorithm for total power constraint has been generalized to multiple linear constraints using a minimax approach [14], and has stimulated the design of another monotonic convergent algorithm based on convexconcave procedure [15] which has slower convergence but can handle nonlinear convex constraints. Nevertheless, the dual link algorithm uses a different derivation approach, which is based on the optimal transmit signal structure, and easily leads a low 1 2 3 T X 1 T X 2 R X 1 R X 2 Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make this possible, we express the involving non-convex constraints as a difference of two convex functions. In fact, the CCP can be seen as a special case of the SCA framework [30] (also known as majorization-minimization (MM)), where a locally tight approximation of the non-convex optimization problem is solved at each iteration [31]. Our contribution in this regard is to develop a second-order cone program (SOCP) in each iteration of the proposed iterative procedure.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the constraints in (13) are non-convex due to the concave term −|| · || 2 2 . In the light of the CCP, this concave part is linearized to obtain a convex approximation [31]. For the description purpose, let us denote by x (n) the value of an optimization variable x after n iterations of the proposed iterative algorithm described below in Algorithm 1.…”
Section: B Continuous Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step, problems (18) and (20) will be convexified by using a linear approximation of the nonconvex terms. This is the approach taken in papers such as [22], [23], and [24]. Instead of solving the reformulated (convex) problem, in the second step, we design a quadratic approximation of the remaining convex terms in order to find a surrogate problem easier to solve.…”
Section: B Weighted Sum-based Formulation To Solve (13)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this appendix, we are going to describe the benchmarks based on the works in [22], [23], and [24]. We start with the benchmark for problem (18).…”
Section: Appendix a Benchmark Formulations And Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%