2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex/concave relaxations of parametric ODEs using Taylor models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives Taylor models a clear advantage over traditional interval extensions or centered forms for sufficiently narrow domains, but conversely it may result in a large overestimation or may even be poorer than naive interval evaluation over wider domains. Nevertheless, this approach has proved successful in computing tight enclosures for the solutions of differential equations and implicit algebraic equations [24,33,42,49,50,53,60], and it has enabled complete search for a range of global optimization or constraint satisfaction problems that could not be tackled using interval techniques alone (see, e.g., [4,9,31,32,47,52]). Such higher-order inclusion techniques are indeed appealing in complete search applications based on branching or subdivision, where they can mitigate the clustering effect [15,62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives Taylor models a clear advantage over traditional interval extensions or centered forms for sufficiently narrow domains, but conversely it may result in a large overestimation or may even be poorer than naive interval evaluation over wider domains. Nevertheless, this approach has proved successful in computing tight enclosures for the solutions of differential equations and implicit algebraic equations [24,33,42,49,50,53,60], and it has enabled complete search for a range of global optimization or constraint satisfaction problems that could not be tackled using interval techniques alone (see, e.g., [4,9,31,32,47,52]). Such higher-order inclusion techniques are indeed appealing in complete search applications based on branching or subdivision, where they can mitigate the clustering effect [15,62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another approach, interval enclosures are derived from a Taylor model of the parametric ODE solutions [20,47,48]. This latter approach was recently extended to enable convex and concave bounds in [49] using so-called McCormick-Taylor models [50]. The computation of guaranteed state bounds has also been considered in different contexts, including reachability analysis and robust control [51][52][53].…”
Section: Output: Lower and Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our implementation of Algorithm 3 is based on the ACADO Toolkit [26] as the local optimal control solversee Sect. 5.4.2-and uses the library MC++ [58] to compute the required nonlinearity bounds as well as the ODE enclosures based on Taylor models combined with rigorous remainder estimates [49]. Note that this is a prototype implementation and we do not report CPU times for this reason.…”
Section: Numerical Case Study: Optimal Control Of a Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we employ verified ODE methods based on Taylor models to compute such over-approximations [Sahlodin and Chachuat, 2011]. Note that the resulting enclosuresŶ (t i ; P ) shrink as width(P ) → 0 and the set-inversion algorithm thus terminates finitely for any finite tolerances ǫ box > 0 and ǫ bnd > 0.…”
Section: Algorithmic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verified ODE integration based on Taylor models Stadtherr, 2007a, Sahlodin andChachuat, 2011] constructs a Taylor model T q x(ti),P of the state variables x(t i ; ·) on P at given times t i ∈ [t 0 , t N ]; that is, ∀p ∈ P :…”
Section: Taylor Model-based Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%