2003
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2003.157.715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex integration for Lipschitz mappings and counterexamples to regularity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
277
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
277
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This question is important because CI solutions are important, many counter examples to natural conjectures in PDE have been achieved via CI [13,19,31,32]. Minimising functional I is the simplest problem that constrains oscillation in some slight way where we can hope to see the effect of the existence of exact minimisers of (1.1).…”
Section: Background and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question is important because CI solutions are important, many counter examples to natural conjectures in PDE have been achieved via CI [13,19,31,32]. Minimising functional I is the simplest problem that constrains oscillation in some slight way where we can hope to see the effect of the existence of exact minimisers of (1.1).…”
Section: Background and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further drawing on an example of [17] it was shown that for N = n = 2 there exists a Lipschitz W 1 BMO-local minimiser of I satisfying the hypotheses (H1)-(H3), but which is non-differentiable on any open set. From this it is clear that a regularising condition like (1.4) is necessary for partial regularity for Lipschitz W 1 BMO-local minimisers.…”
Section: Significance Of the Regularity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Dropping the assumption that u is C 1 is problematic for the reasons pointed out in [22]. See [14,Section 7] for examples of nowhere C 1 weak local minimizers based on the construction of [17]. The assumption K(v) < ∞ would appear to limit possible oscillations of ∇u in the direction tangent to ∂Ω, say, but there is still room for bad behaviour in the directions normal to ∂Ω.…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%