2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex plastic potentials of fourth and sixth rank for anisotropic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classically, the parameter identification makes use of material data issued from mechanical tests, such as yield stress values and/or r-values from tensile tests, biaxial tests, shear tests, plane strain tests, etc. An alternative method uses a micromechanical model and crystallographic texture data for the identification and has been extensively used for the parameter identification of plastic potentials [12,15,17,34,45]. Both identification techniques have been used in this work, and the impact of the identification procedure on the results of the FE simulations is one of its main objectives.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, the parameter identification makes use of material data issued from mechanical tests, such as yield stress values and/or r-values from tensile tests, biaxial tests, shear tests, plane strain tests, etc. An alternative method uses a micromechanical model and crystallographic texture data for the identification and has been extensively used for the parameter identification of plastic potentials [12,15,17,34,45]. Both identification techniques have been used in this work, and the impact of the identification procedure on the results of the FE simulations is one of its main objectives.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Houtte et al [3,7,10] describe the plastic anisotropy of textured polycrystalline materials by means of a plastic potential (D) in strain rate space. The potential is identified as the plastic work dissipated per unit volume in function of the macroscopic plastic strain rate D. For rate-insensitive materials, the deviatoric stress tensor S derived from the plastic flow stress can be calculated for a given tensor D as:…”
Section: Strain Rate Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters in these expressions can be either obtained from real mechanical tests [1], or from virtual tests using a multilevel model to obtain the anisotropic response of the material. The latter approach is adopted in previous work of Van Houtte and Van Bael [2,3]. They have used the theory of plastic potentials in strain rate space and stress space [4][5][6][7] in combination with the Taylor theory [8] as multilevel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The yield locus size is defined by the chosen isotropic hardening model and its position by the chosen kinematic hardening model. Other teams use micro-macro approaches, where the texture evolution is known and used from time to time, to update the yield locus shape (Van Houtte and Van Bael, 2004). Between the updating steps of the yield locus after a given strain interval (typically after 20% of plastic deformation in Peeters et al (2001)), they rely on a constant yield locus shape that must again be expressed in a specific local frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%