Convexity in scientific collaboration networks

Abstract

Convexity in a network (graph) has been recently defined as a property of each of its subgraphs to include all shortest paths between the nodes of that subgraph. It can be measured on the scale [0, 1] with 1 being assigned to fully convex networks. The largest convex component of a graph that emerges after the removal of the least number of edges is called a convex skeleton. It is basically a tree of cliques, which has been shown to have many interesting features. In this article the notions of convexity and convex skeletons in the context of scientific collaboration networks are discussed. More specifically, we analyze the co-authorship networks of Slovenian researchers in computer science, physics, sociology, mathematics, and economics and extract convex skeletons from them. We then compare these convex skeletons with the residual graphs (remainders) in terms of collaboration frequency distributions by various parameters such as the publication year and type, co-authors' birth year, status, gender, discipline, etc. We also show the top-ranked scientists by four basic centrality measures as calculated on the original networks and their skeletons and conclude that convex skeletons may help detect influential scholars that are hardly identifiable in the original collaboration network. As their inherent feature, convex skeletons retain the properties of collaboration networks. These include high-level structural properties but also 2 the fact that the same authors are highlighted by centrality measures. Moreover, the most important ties and thus the most important collaborations are retained in the skeletons.

The Role of Ultrasound in Cancer and Cancer-Related Pain—A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Perspectives

“…Further, collaboration networks provide information on authors from different countries working together for better development of technology. The increase in the number of collaborating countries indicates an improvement in the current research and technology [ 45 ].…”

Evolución y tendencias investigativas en autoeficacia emprendedora: un análisis bibliométrico

“…En la tabla 1 también se presentan los indicadores de estructura en dos períodos de manera acumulativa (1998-2008 y de 1998-2018), con el propósito de realizar un análisis de la evolución de la red de autores en el tiempo. En esta se aprecia un aumento en el número de autores (número de nodos), por lo que la convexidad de una red define la propiedad de incluir todas las mejores rutas de los nodos relacionados con el estudio (Šubelj, Fiala, Ciglarič, y Kronegger, 2019) en el número de autores independientes (número de nodos aislados) y en el número de subredes aisladas (número de componentes aislados). Sin embargo, la tasa de crecimiento de los nodos es mucho más grande que la de los nodos aislados y de componentes conectados, que básicamente tienen como objetivo explorar las mejores rutas de los nodos interceptados y se concentran en investigar las principales fuentes de información (Tu, 2019).…”

Familiarity-Based Collaborative Team Recognition in Academic Social Networks

“…Individual research has increasingly been replaced by collaborative teamwork. Scientific collaboration has been regarded as one of the most effective ways to solve complicated scientific research problems [29,32]. Information technology has greatly facilitated communication between scholars.…”