2018
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2017.2778801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convoluted Arc With Flux Concentrator for Current Interruption

Abstract: Further considerations are given to the use of an electromagnetic flux concentrator for arc plasma control in a rotary arc current interrupter. Such flux concentrators have been previously proposed for plasma fusion and other plasma applications. The possible extension of the proposed method for enhancing the interruption of direct currents with a rotary arc interrupter is discussed with the aid of theoretical modelling of the concentrator geometry and with its possible enhancement of ablation from the arc con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predict model of contact resistance (22) proposed in this paper was verified on the experimental platform. The contact pressure was set to 100 N, the current amplitude to 1 kA, the current frequency to 20 Hz, the sliding velocity to 38 m/s, and the consecutive run times to 10.…”
Section: F Contact Resistance Model Predictionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The predict model of contact resistance (22) proposed in this paper was verified on the experimental platform. The contact pressure was set to 100 N, the current amplitude to 1 kA, the current frequency to 20 Hz, the sliding velocity to 38 m/s, and the consecutive run times to 10.…”
Section: F Contact Resistance Model Predictionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In Figure 12, the contact resistance gradually decreases with the increase of temperature rise, which is caused by the decrease of material hardness. When the contact pressure was 20 N, 60 N and 100 N, the corresponding undetermined coefficients τ are 0.01, 0.0083 and 0.0114, the maximum errors are 4.52%, 3.87% and 3.89%, and the average errors are 1.42%, 1.51% and 1.24%, indicating the correctness and applicability of (22).…”
Section: E Consecutive Run Times Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation