1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0146-664x(76)80032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolution reconstruction of fan beam projections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An interpolation from the polar coordinates to the Cartesian coordinates is needed. This needed interpolation has a similar effect as the interpolation of nonparallel beam projection data to parallel-beam geometry projection data, followed by a parallelbeam geometry reconstruction algorithm [24]. While most previous work seems to prefer a coordinate transformation for an extended inversion formula, the approach of interpolating the projection data into parallel-beam geometry and then use of parallel-beam inversion formula to reconstruct the interpolated data is straightforward.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interpolation from the polar coordinates to the Cartesian coordinates is needed. This needed interpolation has a similar effect as the interpolation of nonparallel beam projection data to parallel-beam geometry projection data, followed by a parallelbeam geometry reconstruction algorithm [24]. While most previous work seems to prefer a coordinate transformation for an extended inversion formula, the approach of interpolating the projection data into parallel-beam geometry and then use of parallel-beam inversion formula to reconstruct the interpolated data is straightforward.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except where otherwise noted, the nonlinear partial volume effect was simulated in the studies below. In all cases, reconstruction of image slices after the helical interpolation proceeded by use of the hybrid fanbeam reconstruction approach we have developed [16], rather than by the standard fanbeam FFBP [17], [18], although we have found that the choice of transverse reconstruction algorithm has very little influence on the longitudinal properties considered here. The imaging parameters for all experiments are given in Table I.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting (7) into this expression yields (17) Reversing the order of the integrals and the summation and making the substitution yields (18) where and remain unchanged in their functional form, despite their dependence on , because they are periodic in with period . It can be shown that for any function (19) even if does not satisfy the consistency condition or the periodicity condition , for all .…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the algorithm as well as the implementation on a computer can be found in Herman et al (1976). Another approach that is used for reconstructing fan beam projections is to first convert the fan-beam data to equivalent parallel beam projection measurements by a method known as rebining (Dreike & Boyd, 1976). The rebined data are then reconstructed using the parallel beam algorithm.…”
Section: Image Reconstruction From Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%