2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional descriptors aggregation via cross-net for skin lesion recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al Designed a multi-CNN collaborative training dermoscopy image lesion recognition model, improves the robustness of lesion identification and verified the effectiveness of the proposed method on related data sets [38]. In order for the model to learn more powerful and more distinguishing feature representation capabilities, Zheng et al Proposed a framework for automatic skin lesion recognition using crossnet based aggregation of multiple convolutional networks, and verified the proposed method through extensive experiments Superiority [39].…”
Section: ⅱ Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Zhang et al Designed a multi-CNN collaborative training dermoscopy image lesion recognition model, improves the robustness of lesion identification and verified the effectiveness of the proposed method on related data sets [38]. In order for the model to learn more powerful and more distinguishing feature representation capabilities, Zheng et al Proposed a framework for automatic skin lesion recognition using crossnet based aggregation of multiple convolutional networks, and verified the proposed method through extensive experiments Superiority [39].…”
Section: ⅱ Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We have made a wide comparison with the advanced melanoma recognition methods, these methods include: based on feature fusion [31], segmentation first and then recognition [34], combining adaptive sample learning strategy with multi-CNN [36], combining deep residual network with Fisher coding [37], multi-CNN collaborative training model [38], combining Fisher Vector and multi-CNN fusion [39]. As seen in Table VII, our method was superior the rank one method [34] in the ISBI 2016 classification task, and the methods [39] 6.3% and 1.3% respectively in AP index score, After the fusion (weighted average) of the prediction results of two different classification networks, the put forward approach exceeds the state-of-the-art method [39] 3.7% in AP index. It is should be noted that some methods contain more intermediate steps or higher calculation amounts.…”
Section: ) Performance Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations