2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.100990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory algorithms for groundwater potential mapping in Anseong, South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, numerous novel methods and algorithms related to artificial intelligence (AI) based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been developed, assessed, and approved in the field of GWP mapping determination; this has been conducted with respect to inventories of water withdrawal points and geological, hydrogeological, hydrological, topographic and climatic factors [11,17,[19][20][21]. On this matter, the following models were commonly used and applied in the sub-cited studies: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), linear regression (LR), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes (NB), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and artificial neural network (ANN) [6,9,14,[22][23][24][25]. Furthermore, a variety of methods have also been proposed to improve the efficiency and precision of the prediction models, such as optimization algorithms and ensemble models [23,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, numerous novel methods and algorithms related to artificial intelligence (AI) based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been developed, assessed, and approved in the field of GWP mapping determination; this has been conducted with respect to inventories of water withdrawal points and geological, hydrogeological, hydrological, topographic and climatic factors [11,17,[19][20][21]. On this matter, the following models were commonly used and applied in the sub-cited studies: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), linear regression (LR), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes (NB), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and artificial neural network (ANN) [6,9,14,[22][23][24][25]. Furthermore, a variety of methods have also been proposed to improve the efficiency and precision of the prediction models, such as optimization algorithms and ensemble models [23,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of groundwater potential sites and various hydrological, hydrogeological, geological, topographic, and climatic factors is a preliminary step before applying any modeling approach. Within the aforementioned studies, several commonly employed models have been utilized, these models include decision tree (DT) (Naghibi et al, 2019), random forest (RF) (Rahmati et al, 2016), support vector machine (SVM) (Anh et al, 2023), naive bayes (NB) (Pham et al, 2021), AdaBoost (AB) (Naghibi et al, 2017), long short-term memory (LSTM) (Hakim et al, 2022), convolutional neural network (CNN) (Hakim et al, 2022), and artificial neural network (ANN) (Tamiru and Wagari, 2022). Additionally, researchers have proposed diverse methodologies to enhance the efficiency and the accuracy of prediction models, including ensemble models and optimization models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is crucial but di cult to identify groundwater potentiality (GWP) zones and determine groundwater availability when numerous deciding factors are present (Kalantar et al, 2019;Hakim et al, 2022). The GWP has been modeled using physical, heuristic, and mathematical techniques (Victor et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%