2020
DOI: 10.4316/aece.2020.02013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional Neural Network Based Prediction of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease: A Technique using Hippocampus Extracted from MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the architecture of a typical CNN. Mukhtar et al 31 used CNN to predict MCIc or MCInc and achieved a prediction accuracy of 94% based on the left hippocampal image of sMRI. Pan et al 32 developed an ensemble classifier combining CNN and ensemble learning, and they used a set of lateral, coronal, or sagittal MRI data.…”
Section: Advanced Methods For Predicting Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the architecture of a typical CNN. Mukhtar et al 31 used CNN to predict MCIc or MCInc and achieved a prediction accuracy of 94% based on the left hippocampal image of sMRI. Pan et al 32 developed an ensemble classifier combining CNN and ensemble learning, and they used a set of lateral, coronal, or sagittal MRI data.…”
Section: Advanced Methods For Predicting Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukhtar and Farhan [ 9 ] proposed a CNN-based deep learning approach for predicting the conversion from MCI to AD using various features, including MRI, genetics, and neuropsychological assessment scores. The CNN model achieved an accuracy of 94 % for predicting MCI to AD conversion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD For fMRI Dataset: 99.95 %. For PET Dataset: 73.46 % [ 9 ] MRI CNN MCIc vs. MCInc 94 % [ 10 ] MRI 3D-CNN MCI vs. CN vs. AD 96.66 % [ 11 ] MRI MLP MCI vs. CN vs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, follow-up readings of all biomarkers are subjected to a stage transition. Auto regression Y Y 84.29 [14] PCA and posterior probability Y 84 [15] LR, extrapolation, and SVM Y 77.87 [18] LR, NB, EN, KNN, KNN, GTB, and SVM Y Y 84 [20] Deep sequential NN Y 83 [21] Rad-sig and SVM Y Y Y 80 [22] DNN Y Y Y 63.30 [23] CNN Y Y Y 94 [24] Regression and SVM Y 71.16 [25] WT and SVM Y 84.13 [ To choose the most suitable future value from the two possible values recorded, proximity measures are used. Let i be the sample having two known consecutive annual values whose next value, v 3 is to be forecasted.…”
Section: Marker Selection and Normalization Sperling Et Al's Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%