2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural network for predicting crack pattern and stress-crack width curve of air-void structure in 3D printed concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict intricate crack propagation patterns in composite materials, DL pipeline methodologies were employed in the literature, which involve the training of distinct and sequential DL models for separate prediction tasks, such as stress distribution and crack growth patterns. [35][36][37] For instance, a U-Net-based DL model was trained to predict stress distributions (output) derived from composite configurations (input), while another U-Net-based DL model is trained using stress distributions (input) and crack behaviors (output). [35][36][37] A DL pipeline that sequentially concatenates two DL models has demonstrated exceptional results in predicting crack behavior.…”
Section: Predicting Crack Phase Fields At Crack Initiation and Comple...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To predict intricate crack propagation patterns in composite materials, DL pipeline methodologies were employed in the literature, which involve the training of distinct and sequential DL models for separate prediction tasks, such as stress distribution and crack growth patterns. [35][36][37] For instance, a U-Net-based DL model was trained to predict stress distributions (output) derived from composite configurations (input), while another U-Net-based DL model is trained using stress distributions (input) and crack behaviors (output). [35][36][37] A DL pipeline that sequentially concatenates two DL models has demonstrated exceptional results in predicting crack behavior.…”
Section: Predicting Crack Phase Fields At Crack Initiation and Comple...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37] For instance, a U-Net-based DL model was trained to predict stress distributions (output) derived from composite configurations (input), while another U-Net-based DL model is trained using stress distributions (input) and crack behaviors (output). [35][36][37] A DL pipeline that sequentially concatenates two DL models has demonstrated exceptional results in predicting crack behavior. However, such methods may sequentially amplify errors from each model, potentially resulting in unexpected or unphysical crack predictions for previously unseen composite configurations.…”
Section: Predicting Crack Phase Fields At Crack Initiation and Comple...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs: Deep learning-based detection system helps reduce operating costs associated with solar panel maintenance by improving the analysis process and increasing protection. Early detection of defects can also reduce downtime and maximize energy output and revenue from your solar installation [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Chang et al utilized a CNN to predict crack patterns and stress-crack width curves in 3D-printed concrete structures, a material of increasing importance in construction and engineering applications [14]. CNNs' successful application to predicting crack behavior in such complex materials underscores their versatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%