2020
DOI: 10.1080/19393555.2020.1722867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural networks for image spam detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the good results, Ref. [29] stated that the features used by these previous works were computationally extensive to extract. The authors of [29] proposed the use of the Canny edge detector combined with the raw image as features of images, which were then fed to a CNN model.…”
Section: Image-based Feature Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the good results, Ref. [29] stated that the features used by these previous works were computationally extensive to extract. The authors of [29] proposed the use of the Canny edge detector combined with the raw image as features of images, which were then fed to a CNN model.…”
Section: Image-based Feature Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] stated that the features used by these previous works were computationally extensive to extract. The authors of [29] proposed the use of the Canny edge detector combined with the raw image as features of images, which were then fed to a CNN model. Their experiment showed good results on the ISH dataset compared to improved Challenge Dataset 1 and 2.…”
Section: Image-based Feature Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proposed model achieved high accuracy values on text and hybrid (image/text) spam, with relatively low performance when only spam images were tested. Sharmin et al [11] presented image spam classifiers using SVM, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and CNN. For SVM and MLP, canny edge detector was used to extract efficient edge information.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identified gap in this authors work is that it did not capture how effective the model is when it comes to image-based spam, however, it is pertinent to bear in mind the two phenomena raised -the issue of "concept drift" and "catastrophic forgetting" so a model developed should be capable of detecting both and attempt to recycle an old spamming approach or detect the evolution of a new spamming approach. Sharmin, Di Troia, Potika, & Stamp, (2020) studied the problem of image spam detection, based on image analysis, where they applied convolutional neural networks (CNN). In the study, comparisons were made between results of other machine learning techniques and that of the study, and the results of previous related work.…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponential growth and popularity of use, coupled with very high reachability, and a significantly low cost of operation, has made the email a more economical messaging platform for sending a new type of email called spam (Shandilya, Polash & Shiva 2014). Spam emails also called junk mails, are unsolicited bulk e-mails, sent to random recipients in large quantities, with commercial, fraudulent, or malicious intentions (Khawandi, Abdallah, & Ismail, 2019;Sharmin, Di Troia, Potika, & Stamp, 2020). Spammers (senders of spam emails) have evolved several spamming techniques to fool existing spam filters with identifiable weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%