2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.08747
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutions of Liouvillian Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exponent 30 in the proof of Proposition 3.2 is hilarious but the reader understands that we do not optimize bounds and instead focus on simplicity of arguments. We can decrease it by computing the product a(x)b(x) more quickly but in a less elementary way in O((mn) 1+o (1) ) steps by [ 1) ) steps, again in close to optimum complexity. F. Johansson reports computing p(10 6 ) by his algorithm in milliseconds and p (10 19 ) in less than 100 hours; see [81] for his computation of p(10 20 ).…”
Section: Integer Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exponent 30 in the proof of Proposition 3.2 is hilarious but the reader understands that we do not optimize bounds and instead focus on simplicity of arguments. We can decrease it by computing the product a(x)b(x) more quickly but in a less elementary way in O((mn) 1+o (1) ) steps by [ 1) ) steps, again in close to optimum complexity. F. Johansson reports computing p(10 6 ) by his algorithm in milliseconds and p (10 19 ) in less than 100 hours; see [81] for his computation of p(10 20 ).…”
Section: Integer Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Fill, S. Janson and M. D. Ward [56] proved that f dm (n) = exp((1 + o(1)) 1 3 (6n) 1/3 log n) and D. Kane and R. C. Rhoades [84] obtained an even more precise asymptotics.…”
Section: Computation-wise For P(n) It Lags Far Behind the H-r-r Formu...mentioning
confidence: 99%