2014
DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooking losses, lipid oxidation and formation of volatile compounds in foal meat as affected by cooking procedure

Abstract: The present study deals with the effect of four different cooking techniques (roasting, grilling, microwave baking and frying with olive oil) on cooking losses, lipid oxidation (by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) measurement) and formation of volatile compounds (using solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC–MS)) of foal meat. Statistical analysis displayed significant (P < 0.001) differences on cooking losses by thermal treatment, being lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
48
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
13
48
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study, there was no significant difference in CL values due to MWO and EO cooking either in chicken breast or TM ( p > .05). In other studies, it was observed that MWO cooking process showed higher CL than roasting (EO cooking) in foal meats (Dominguez, Gomez, Fonseca, & Lorenzo, , ; Lorenzo & Dominguez, ) and in camel meat (Yarmand, Nikmaram, Djomeh, & Homayouni, ). These differences in CL values between the results of the current study and those reported in previous studies could be attributed to the differences in the meat type and cooking parameters used in the experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, in the present study, there was no significant difference in CL values due to MWO and EO cooking either in chicken breast or TM ( p > .05). In other studies, it was observed that MWO cooking process showed higher CL than roasting (EO cooking) in foal meats (Dominguez, Gomez, Fonseca, & Lorenzo, , ; Lorenzo & Dominguez, ) and in camel meat (Yarmand, Nikmaram, Djomeh, & Homayouni, ). These differences in CL values between the results of the current study and those reported in previous studies could be attributed to the differences in the meat type and cooking parameters used in the experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1-pentanol, which has a pleasant odor, has been found in cooked foal meat and is generated from the oxidation of C18:2n-6. [47,48] The compound 1-octen-3-ol is an odor contributor to the fatty characteristics of meat flavors in boiled chicken meat. [8] This compound is formed by the auto-oxidation of linoleic acid or other polyunsaturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Changes In Volatile Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] This compound is formed by the auto-oxidation of linoleic acid or other polyunsaturated fatty acids. [47] Sensory panelists reported that chicken meat showed a more intense flavor after 3 h of stewing compared with that after 2 h of stewing. This result may reflect the significant increase of 1-pentanol levels after 3 h of stewing.…”
Section: Changes In Volatile Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven alcohols were found in marinated steaks, and among these, three (3‐methyl‐butan‐1‐ol, 2‐methyl‐butan‐2‐ol, and phenylethyl alcohol) were only detected in the treated samples and another (pentan‐1‐ol) was only present in the CONTROL beef. Lorenzo and Domínguez reported the occurrence of 1‐octen‐3‐ol in cooked steaks, with this alcohol being described as an important volatile component of cooked beef providing a characteristic ‘fungic’ odor . On the other hand, 1‐pentanol, which is commonly found at low concentrations in meat and imparts fruity and balsamic odors, was found only in the CONTROL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%