2019
DOI: 10.2754/avb201988040487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooking of meat: effect on texture, cooking loss and microbiological quality – a review

Abstract: Cooking can positively affect meat tenderness, on the other hand, the heat treatment also causes weight loss. The resulting tenderness of cooked meat is influenced by the background toughness of fresh meat, by the post mortem ageing process and by the method of cooking. In the case of heat treatment, the temperature and duration of action play a key role. In this respect, the meat tenderness depends on the type of appliance used for cooking. The cooking loss of meat during heat treatment is caused by contracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The control samples of this study exhibited the significantly highest (p<0.05) cook losses (CL), followed by T1 (Fig. 3b), which occurred due to the denaturation, gelation and subsequent contraction of muscle fibers upon exposure to high temperature (Ježek et al, 2020). The heat-induced structural changes of the meat proteins in the T0 samples were instigated by the expulsion of the free water held by capillary forces from the threedimensional protein matrix during muscle fiber shrinkage, which led to the reduction of weight and volume of the meat (Barbera, 2019).…”
Section: Cook Lossmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The control samples of this study exhibited the significantly highest (p<0.05) cook losses (CL), followed by T1 (Fig. 3b), which occurred due to the denaturation, gelation and subsequent contraction of muscle fibers upon exposure to high temperature (Ježek et al, 2020). The heat-induced structural changes of the meat proteins in the T0 samples were instigated by the expulsion of the free water held by capillary forces from the threedimensional protein matrix during muscle fiber shrinkage, which led to the reduction of weight and volume of the meat (Barbera, 2019).…”
Section: Cook Lossmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Accounting for that, the major variables to determine the doneness should be cooking temperature, time, and heating method (Aaslyng et al, 2003;Unklesbay et al, 1988) that all determine such characteristics as juiciness, tenderness, color, and flavor (Choi et al, 2016). At high temperatures, typical of grilling, the observed heavy water loss is expected to be negatively correlated with juiciness (Aaslyng et al, 2003) and have a great influence on its tenderness (Ježek et al, 2019).…”
Section: Combination Of E-nose and Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparison among freezing treatments, the pattern of cooking loss also showed linearity with the freezing rate. However, the regression model of cooking loss showed less of a relationship with freezing rate (r 2 =0.62) than that of thawing loss (r 2 =0.75) because cooking loss of meat was affected not only by freezing conditions but also by cooking conditions (Ježek et al, 2019). However, cooking loss was closely correlated with juiciness, which was an important indicator to predict the chewiness and mouthfeel of meat (Aaslyng et al, 2003).…”
Section: Thawing Loss and Cooking Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%