2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooled-radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar facet (zygapophyseal) joint pain

Abstract: Cooled-radiofrequency (CRFA) is a newer technique and may have some theoretical advantages over traditional radiofrequency ablation (TRFA). In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CRFA for the treatment of lumbar facet joint-mediated pain. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 185 CRFA performed on 105 patients. All patients with axial lower back who received the preliminary diagnosis of lumbar facet joint-mediated pain and refractory to conservative therapy underwent diagnostic m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Candan et al [23] reported that cooled radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar is considered to have a significant clinical impact when patients report pain improvement of at least 50%, finding pain reduction of 60.5% in the first follow-up (four to eight weeks) and 53.6% in the second followup (>two to six months), which is consistent with the percentage of pain reduction obtained in the present study. Additionally, due to the lack of adverse effects or severe complications, excluding the expected local pain after the procedure, which in all cases could be controlled with oral analgesics, CRT can be considered a safe procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Candan et al [23] reported that cooled radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar is considered to have a significant clinical impact when patients report pain improvement of at least 50%, finding pain reduction of 60.5% in the first follow-up (four to eight weeks) and 53.6% in the second followup (>two to six months), which is consistent with the percentage of pain reduction obtained in the present study. Additionally, due to the lack of adverse effects or severe complications, excluding the expected local pain after the procedure, which in all cases could be controlled with oral analgesics, CRT can be considered a safe procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%